These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11917409)
21. Preserving vaginal birth: a call to action. Williams DR; Avery MD J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(4):239-241. PubMed ID: 16814216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Should elective cesarean birth be an accepted option for women? Tillett J J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2005; 19(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 15796417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Obstetrician who blamed delay in a Caesarean section on a "stupid midwife" is struck off. Dyer C BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6066. PubMed ID: 25294060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. What is the right number of caesarean sections? Lancet; 1997 Mar; 349(9055):815. PubMed ID: 9121248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. An audit on trends of vaginal delivery after one previous caesarean section. Singh T; Justin CW; Haloob RK J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Feb; 24(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 14766447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical practice of caesarean section revisited: present and future. Shek NW Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Aug; 23(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 28775220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Caesarean section: The ultimate by-product of the One Two Punch Theory. Fenwick J Women Birth; 2009 Dec; 22(4):107-8. PubMed ID: 19734115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. How to decrease the number of caesarean sections in Italy. Guarino C; Sansone M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Oct; 24 Suppl 1():114-6. PubMed ID: 21942608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Caesarean section at maternal request--the differing views of patients and healthcare professionals: a questionnaire based study. Sharpe AN; Waring GJ; Rees J; McGarry K; Hinshaw K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Sep; 192():54-60. PubMed ID: 26151240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Wu JM; Hundley AF; Visco AG Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 15684156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. British caesarean section rates: have we reached a plateau? Savage W; Francome C Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 May; 100(5):493-6. PubMed ID: 8518254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Meeting maternal request for caesarean section - paving the road to hell? McCandlish R Midwifery; 2006 Sep; 22(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 16920508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Choice in cesarean. Davies L Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (86):22-5. PubMed ID: 18630009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Swedish caregivers' attitudes towards caesarean section on maternal request. Karlström A; Engström-Olofsson R; Nystedt A; Thomas J; Hildingsson I Women Birth; 2009 Jun; 22(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 19195958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians' and midwives' accounts. Kamal P; Dixon-Woods M; Kurinczuk JJ; Oppenheimer C; Squire P; Waugh J BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1054-60. PubMed ID: 16045517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Caesarean section controversy. Further research is needed on why rates of caesarean section are increasing. O'Connell MP; Lindow W BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7241):1074. PubMed ID: 10836807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Up, up and away: watching the Caesarean section rate rise. May AE; Yentis SM Anaesthesia; 2002 Apr; 57(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 11939987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery. Lavender T; Kingdon C; Hart A; Gyte G; Gabbay M; Neilson JP BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7515):490-1. PubMed ID: 16115829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]