22 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11917575)
1. A cross-sectional study exploring triage of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women by visual assessment, manual and computer-interpreted cytology, and HPV-16/18-45 genotyping in Cameroon.
Vassilakos P; Wisniak A; Catarino R; Tincho Foguem E; Balli C; Saiji E; Tille JC; Kenfack B; Petignat P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jun; 31(6):808-816. PubMed ID: 33833084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological Diagnosis of Gastric Cancers with a Novel Computerized Analysis System.
Oikawa K; Saito A; Kiyuna T; Graf HP; Cosatto E; Kuroda M
J Pathol Inform; 2017; 8():5. PubMed ID: 28400994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytomorphological characteristics of glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: histopathological correlation and human papillomavirus genotyping.
Jung YY; Nahm JH; Kim HS
Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(45):74152-74161. PubMed ID: 27708230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology].
Ikenberg H
Pathologe; 2011 Nov; 32(6):476-83. PubMed ID: 22038134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary screening for cervical cancer precursors by the combined use of liquid-based cytology, computer-assisted cytology and HPV DNA testing.
Vassilakos P; Petignat P; Boulvain M; Campana A
Br J Cancer; 2002 Feb; 86(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 11875704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liquid-based cervical cytology.
Klinkhamer PJ; Meerding WJ; Rosier PF; Hanselaar AG
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14579292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does use of the AutoPap assisted primary screener improve cytologic diagnosis?
Bibbo M; Hawthorne C; Zimmerman B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9987445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical cytopathology laboratory.
Bishop JW; Cheuvront DA; Sims KL
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 10740595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
Hessling JJ; Raso DS; Schiffer B; Callicott J; Husain M; Taylor D
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.
Wilbur DC; Prey MU; Miller WM; Pawlick GF; Colgan TJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 9479343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of automated primary screening on liquid-based, thin-layer preparations.
Vassilakos P; Carrel S; Petignat P; Boulvain M; Campana A
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 11917575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
