183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11917713)
1. [Comparative study between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of the pancreatic and biliary obstruction].
Pisani JC; Bacelar A; Malafaia O; Ribas-Filho JM; Czezcko NG; Nassif PA
Arq Gastroenterol; 2001; 38(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 11917713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary disease: comparative study with conventional ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography diagnostic algorithm.
Pamos S; Benages A; Medina E; Martinez Sanjuan V
Dig Liver Dis; 2003 Mar; 35(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 12779073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Single shot fast spin echo sequence MRI cholangiopancreatography].
Lefèvre F; Crouzet P; Gaucher H; Chapuis F; Béot S; Boccaccini H; Bazin C; Régent D
J Radiol; 1998 May; 79(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9757270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.
Barish MA; Yucel EK; Soto JA; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 7618543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography].
Mitake M; Okamura S; Ohashi S; Urano F; Simodaira M; Kanamori S; Ohyama I; Okada N; Segawa K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2885-9. PubMed ID: 9847615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Owens GR; Shutz SM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of multidetector computed tomography cholangiography in evaluation of cause of biliary tract obstruction.
Tongdee T; Amornvittayachan O; Tongdee R
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 May; 93(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 20524442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction.
Georgopoulos SK; Schwartz LH; Jarnagin WR; Gerdes H; Breite I; Fong Y; Blumgart LH; Kurtz RC
Arch Surg; 1999 Sep; 134(9):1002-7. PubMed ID: 10487597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Should magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnostic algorithm of biliary-pancreatic diseases?].
Maluf-Filho F
Arq Gastroenterol; 2001; 38(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 11917712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of false-negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures: the experience at 2 university hospitals.
Logrono R; Kurtycz DF; Molina CP; Trivedi VA; Wong JY; Block KP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Mar; 124(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 10705391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Bret PM; Reinhold C
Endoscopy; 1997 Aug; 29(6):472-86. PubMed ID: 9342565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings.
Stroszczynski C; Hunerbein M
Abdom Imaging; 2005; 30(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15965779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: non-invasive imaging for the biliary tree and pancreatic duct.
Little AF; Smith PJ; Hennessy OF; Lee WK
Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):266-9. PubMed ID: 9762066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
Yamaguchi K; Chijiwa K; Shimizu S; Yokohata K; Morisaki T; Tanaka M
Am J Surg; 1998 Mar; 175(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9560120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Soto JA; Barish MA; Yucel EK; Siegenberg D; Ferrucci JT; Chuttani R
Gastroenterology; 1996 Feb; 110(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 8566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
