217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11917932)
1. State court says informed consent procedures were unacceptable.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 May; 15(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research regulations on subjects' "capacity to give consent" were unconstitutional.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulating research with vulnerable populations: litigation gone awry.
Oldham JM; Haimowitz S; Delano SJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 15573435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects.
Candilis PJ; Wesley RW; Wichman A
IRB; 1993; 15(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court said IRB had too much power to make consent decisions for minors.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical resesarch--Maryland's policy initiative.
Hoffman DE; Schwartz J
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):123-53. PubMed ID: 15573434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State regulations on protecting mentally disabled research subjects are ruled invalid.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11658062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research oversight and adults with cognitive impairment.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 14983552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The new Dutch 'medical experimentation bill' and incompetent patients.
Cusveller BS; Jochemsen H
Ethics Med; 1993; 9(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 11652740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?
Hoffmann DE; Schwartz J; DeRenzo EG
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2000; 3(3-4):547-608. PubMed ID: 16594106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent of the mentally disabled: a failing fiction.
Chayet NL
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):82-85+. PubMed ID: 11662298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000--excerpt.
Scotland
Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Apr; (157):8-11. PubMed ID: 11842859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Maryland's effort to regulate ethically sensitive research: a step in the right direction.
Schwartz J
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):169-74. PubMed ID: 11658173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Involuntary commitment, incompetency, and consent.
Holder AR
IRB; 1983; 5(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 11653519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent for research is related to basic legal rights of all individuals.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Mar; 15(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Handicapped persons as research subjects.
Bersoff DN
Amicus; 1979; 4(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 11663096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research with adults who lack capacity.
Bull Med Ethics; 2005 Feb; (205):8-11. PubMed ID: 16175700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
