184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11918295)
1. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach.
Zimmerma S; Hawkes WG; Hudson JI; Magaziner J; Hebel JR; Towheed T; Gardner J; Provenzano G; Kenzora JE
J Orthop Res; 2002 Mar; 20(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 11918295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery.
Fortin PR; Clarke AE; Joseph L; Liang MH; Tanzer M; Ferland D; Phillips C; Partridge AJ; Bélisle P; Fossel AH; Mahomed N; Sledge CB; Katz JN
Arthritis Rheum; 1999 Aug; 42(8):1722-8. PubMed ID: 10446873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
Kenzora JE; Magaziner J; Hudson J; Hebel JR; Young Y; Hawkes W; Felsenthal G; Zimmerman SI; Provenzano G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):51-8. PubMed ID: 9553533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in the treatment of Chinese patients with femoral head necrosis.
Hui Z; Pei FX; Shen B; Yang J; Chen ZY; Huang Q
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1022-30. PubMed ID: 18534498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cemented femoral revision: technique and outcome.
Nelson CL
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Apr; 31(4):187-9. PubMed ID: 12008847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results.
Hartzband MA
Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 15062697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Total hip replacement from a MIS-AL approach (comparison with a standard anterolateral approach)].
Kubes J; Landor I; Podskubka A; Majernícek M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Aug; 76(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 19755052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Selection of the type in revision total hip replacement for failed hip arthroplasty].
Zhang XB; Song JH; Wang KZ
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 18(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 15065415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
Masár J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of results after reimplantation of total hip arthroplasty cemented cup].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Pacovský V; Pazdírek P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15069860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stepwise introduction of a bone-conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study: II. Clinical proof of concept--40 patients followed for 2 years.
Carlsson LV; Albrektsson T; Albrektsson BE; Jacobsson CM; Macdonald W; Regnér L; Weidenhielm LR
Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 16929431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective outcomes analysis of femoral component fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Iorio R; Healy WL; Presutti AH
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 18534542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
Cech O; Dzupa V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid total hip replacement: outcome after a mean follow up of 10 years.
Horne G; Culliford N; Adams K; Devane P
ANZ J Surg; 2007 Aug; 77(8):638-41. PubMed ID: 17635275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
