137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11918367)
1. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization.
Chakraborty D
Acad Radiol; 2002 Feb; 9(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 11918367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.
Chakraborty DP; Berbaum KS
Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2313-30. PubMed ID: 15377098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
Wunderlich A; Abbey CK
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1554-66. PubMed ID: 19000872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hypothesis testing in noninferiority and equivalence MRMC ROC studies.
Chen W; Petrick NA; Sahiner B
Acad Radiol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1158-65. PubMed ID: 22717591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical power considerations for a utility endpoint in observer performance studies.
Abbey CK; Samuelson FW; Gallas BD
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):798-806. PubMed ID: 23611439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies.
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):628-38. PubMed ID: 20380980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: validation with computer simulation.
Roe CA; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 Apr; 4(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 9110028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: factorial experimental design.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Lenth RV; Chen YF; Donaghy BA
Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):591-602. PubMed ID: 9750888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):709-16. PubMed ID: 9419629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1260-73. PubMed ID: 15561573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A probabilistic model for the MRMC method, part 1: theoretical development.
Clarkson E; Kupinski MA; Barrett HH
Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1410-21. PubMed ID: 17070460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Hillis SL; Obuchowski NA; Schartz KM; Berbaum KS
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1579-607. PubMed ID: 15685718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1534-41. PubMed ID: 16321742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
