These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11919280)

  • 1. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Cunningham CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 11919280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Simon C; Chambers GK
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 12116595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence.
    Alfaro ME; Zoller S; Lutzoni F
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Feb; 20(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 12598693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phylogeny of Bembidion and related ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechinae: Bembidiini: Bembidiina).
    Maddison DR
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Jun; 63(3):533-76. PubMed ID: 22421212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tail paradox, partial identifiability, and influential priors in Bayesian branch length inference.
    Rannala B; Zhu T; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Jan; 29(1):325-35. PubMed ID: 21890479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of the monophyly of morning glory taxa using Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Miller RE; Buckley TR; Manos PS
    Syst Biol; 2002 Oct; 51(5):740-53. PubMed ID: 12396588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1994 Sep; 39(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 7932792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):980-4. PubMed ID: 15496922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of ignoring secondary structure on divergence time estimates from ribosomal RNA genes.
    Dohrmann M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Feb; 71():214-23. PubMed ID: 24361769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in modes and rates of evolution in nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal DNA in the mushroom genus Amanita (Agaricales, Basidiomycota): phylogenetic implications.
    Moncalvo JM; Drehmel D; Vilgalys R
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Jul; 16(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 10877939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Composite likelihood modeling of neighboring site correlations of DNA sequence substitution rates.
    Deng L; Moore DF
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article 6. PubMed ID: 19222389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.
    Posada D
    J Mol Evol; 2001 May; 52(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 11443347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. bModelTest: Bayesian phylogenetic site model averaging and model comparison.
    Bouckaert RR; Drummond AJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28166715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Substitution rate variation among sites in mitochondrial hypervariable region I of humans and chimpanzees.
    Excoffier L; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):1357-68. PubMed ID: 10563016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.