142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11919284)
1. When does the incongruence length difference test fail?
Darlu P; Lecointre G
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 11919284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test.
Dolphin K; Belshaw R; Orme CD; Quicke DL
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Dec; 17(3):401-6. PubMed ID: 11133194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correcting the problem of false incongruence due to noise imbalance in the incongruence length difference (ILD) test.
Quicke DL; Jones OR; Epstein DR
Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 17562473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting phylogenetic incongruence using BIONJ: an improvement of the ILD test.
Zelwer M; Daubin V
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Dec; 33(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 15522796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The performance of the Congruence Among Distance Matrices (CADM) test in phylogenetic analysis.
Campbell V; Legendre P; Lapointe FJ
BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():64. PubMed ID: 21388552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel Test for Absolute Fit of Evolutionary Models Provides a Means to Correctly Identify the Substitution Model and the Model Tree.
Goremykin V
Genome Biol Evol; 2019 Aug; 11(8):2403-2419. PubMed ID: 31368483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Let them fall where they may: congruence analysis in massive phylogenetically messy data sets.
Leigh JW; Schliep K; Lopez P; Bapteste E
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2773-85. PubMed ID: 21527387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Escherichia coli molecular phylogeny using the incongruence length difference test.
Lecointre G; Rachdi L; Darlu P; Denamur E
Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Dec; 15(12):1685-95. PubMed ID: 9866203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mtdna and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks (Nomonyx-Oxyura)?
McCracken K; Sorenson M
Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 15805009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifiability of the unrooted species tree topology under the coalescent model with time-reversible substitution processes, site-specific rate variation, and invariable sites.
Chifman J; Kubatko L
J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():35-47. PubMed ID: 25791286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
Sourdis J; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) and exploring data congruence using a partition addition bootstrap alteration (PABA) approach.
Struck TH; Purschke G; Halanych KM
Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 16507520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixture models of nucleotide sequence evolution that account for heterogeneity in the substitution process across sites and across lineages.
Jayaswal V; Wong TK; Robinson J; Poladian L; Jermiin LS
Syst Biol; 2014 Sep; 63(5):726-42. PubMed ID: 24927722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating phylogenetic congruence in the post-genomic era.
Leigh JW; Lapointe FJ; Lopez P; Bapteste E
Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():571-87. PubMed ID: 21712432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.
Qiao B; Goldberg TL; Olsen GJ; Weigel RM
Infect Genet Evol; 2006 Jul; 6(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 16406823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing substitution models within a phylogenetic tree.
Weiss G; von Haeseler A
Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Apr; 20(4):572-8. PubMed ID: 12679552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
