133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11921310)
1. Testing the convergent validity of the contingent valuation and travel cost methods in valuing the benefits of health care.
Clarke PM
Health Econ; 2002 Mar; 11(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 11921310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-benefit analysis and mammographic screening: a travel cost approach.
Clarke PM
J Health Econ; 1998 Dec; 17(6):767-87. PubMed ID: 10339252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Willingness to pay for public health services in rural Central Java, Indonesia: methodological considerations when using the contingent valuation method.
Shono A; Kondo M; Ohmae H; Okubo I
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 110():31-40. PubMed ID: 24713191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there a kink in consumers' threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care?
O'Brien BJ; Gertsen K; Willan AR; Faulkner LA
Health Econ; 2002 Mar; 11(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 11921315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature.
Diener A; O'Brien B; Gafni A
Health Econ; 1998 Jun; 7(4):313-26. PubMed ID: 9683092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GET MORE, PAY MORE? An elaborate test of construct validity of willingness to pay per QALY estimates obtained through contingent valuation.
Bobinac A; van Exel NJ; Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
J Health Econ; 2012 Jan; 31(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 22018622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and Validity of the Contingent Valuation Method for Estimating Willingness to Pay: A Case of In Vitro Fertilisation.
Settumba SN; Shanahan M; Botha W; Ramli MZ; Chambers GM
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2019 Feb; 17(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 30315488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuing the benefits of genetic testing for retinitis pigmentosa: a pilot application of the contingent valuation method.
Eden M; Payne K; Combs RM; Hall G; McAllister M; Black GC
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 97(8):1051-6. PubMed ID: 23743435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Demand for health care in Denmark: results of a national sample survey using contingent valuation.
Gyldmark M; Morrison GC
Soc Sci Med; 2001 Oct; 53(8):1023-36. PubMed ID: 11556772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing WTP values of different types of QALY gain elicited from the general public.
Pennington M; Baker R; Brouwer W; Mason H; Hansen DG; Robinson A; Donaldson C;
Health Econ; 2015 Mar; 24(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 25625510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Willingness to pay for ecosystem services of urban river in Shanghai].
Zhao J; Yang K; Tai J; Wu EN
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Mar; 26(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 16004291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Private and public willingness to pay for safety: A validity test.
Andersson H; Levivier E; Lindberg G
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():170-175. PubMed ID: 30517899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes.
Bijlenga D; Bonsel GJ; Birnie E
Health Econ; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1392-406. PubMed ID: 20967891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of a QALY: individual willingness to pay for health gains under risk.
Bobinac A; van Exel J; Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Jan; 32(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 24293198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The distribution problem in economic evaluation: income and the valuation of costs and consequences of health care programmes.
Donaldson C; Birch S; Gafni A
Health Econ; 2002 Jan; 11(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 11788982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating Willingness to Pay for an Improved Service Delivery to Patients Referring Namazi Hospital Chemical Therapy Ward in Iran Using Contingent Valuation.
Kavosi Z; Jafari A; Keshtkaran V; Pourahmadi E
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(7):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 30049193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating a constant WTP for a QALY-a mission impossible?
Sund B; Svensson M
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Jul; 19(6):871-880. PubMed ID: 28932914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empirical implications of response acquiescence in discrete-choice contingent valuation.
Yeung RY; Smith RD; Ho LM; Johnston JM; Leung GM
Health Econ; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1077-89. PubMed ID: 16518835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Willingness to pay and the sensitivity of willingness to pay for interdisciplinary musculoskeletal clinics: a contingent valuation study in Quebec, Canada.
Poder TG; He J
Int J Health Econ Manag; 2016 Dec; 16(4):337-361. PubMed ID: 27878690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating starting-point bias: a survey of willingness to pay for insecticide-treated nets.
Onwujekwe O; Nwagbo D
Soc Sci Med; 2002 Dec; 55(12):2121-30. PubMed ID: 12409125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
