These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11921660)
1. The influence of design on bioprosthetic valve durability. Vesely I J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 11921660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evolution of bioprosthetic heart valve design and its impact on durability. Vesely I Cardiovasc Pathol; 2003; 12(5):277-86. PubMed ID: 14507578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does pericardial thickness guarantee a homogeneous bioprosthetic product? Evaluation of modification in the physical characteristics of bovine pericardium exposed to pressure stress test. Mikus PM; Arpesella G; Gargiulo G; Cirillo M; Marrozzini C; Pierangeli V; Pierangeli A Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():237-40. PubMed ID: 3727692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The failure modes of biological prosthetic heart valves. Butany J; Leask R J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):115-35. PubMed ID: 11921659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new design for polyurethane heart valves. Butterfield M; Wheatley DJ; Williams DF; Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 11206756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of pannus in the longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Butany JW; Kesarwani R; Yau TM; Singh G; Thangaroopan M; Nair V; Leong SW J Card Surg; 2006; 21(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 16948773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach. Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of an ideal stent design and its impact on the aortic endothelium during and after percutaneous replacement. Praveen Kumar GV; Mathew L Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010 Jun; 13(3):345-7. PubMed ID: 19816835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology. Schoen FJ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current state of in vivo preclinical heart valve evaluation. Salerno CT; Droel J; Bianco RW J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9587855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opening and closure characteristics of different types of stented biological valves. Kuehnel RU; Pohl A; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Hartrumpf M; Pohl M; Albes JM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 54(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16541347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement and reconstruction of the leaflet geometry for a pericardial artificial heart valve. Jiang H; Campbell G; Xi F Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15642513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New insights in minimally invasive valve replacement: description of a cooperative approach for the off-pump replacement of mitral valves. Boudjemline Y; Pineau E; Borenstein N; Behr L; Bonhoeffer P Eur Heart J; 2005 Oct; 26(19):2013-7. PubMed ID: 15872031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]