These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11921806)

  • 1. Simulation study for cloud detection with space lidars by use of analog detection photomultiplier tubes.
    Liu Z; Sugimoto N
    Appl Opt; 2002 Mar; 41(9):1750-9. PubMed ID: 11921806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating random errors due to shot noise in backscatter lidar observations.
    Liu Z; Hunt W; Vaughan M; Hostetler C; McGill M; Powell K; Winker D; Hu Y
    Appl Opt; 2006 Jun; 45(18):4437-47. PubMed ID: 16778954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulations of the observation of clouds and aerosols with the Experimental Lidar in Space Equipment system.
    Liu Z; Voelger P; Sugimoto N
    Appl Opt; 2000 Jun; 39(18):3120-37. PubMed ID: 18345243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of the doubly stochastic Neyman type-A and Thomas counting distributions in photon detection.
    Teich MC
    Appl Opt; 1981 Jul; 20(14):2457-67. PubMed ID: 20332977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical treatment of photon/electron counting: extending the linear dynamic range from the dark count rate to saturation.
    Kissick DJ; Muir RD; Simpson GJ
    Anal Chem; 2010 Dec; 82(24):10129-34. PubMed ID: 21114249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Probabilistic Approach to Estimating Allowed SNR Values for Automotive LiDARs in "Smart Cities" under Various External Influences.
    Meshcheryakov R; Iskhakov A; Mamchenko M; Romanova M; Uvaysov S; Amirgaliyev Y; Gromaszek K
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ranging performance model considering the pulse pileup effect for PMT-based photon-counting lidars.
    Zhang Z; Ma Y; Li S; Zhao P; Xiang Y; Liu X; Zhang W
    Opt Express; 2020 Apr; 28(9):13586-13600. PubMed ID: 32403830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method for the reduction of signal-induced noise in photomultiplier tubes.
    Williamson CK; De Young RJ
    Appl Opt; 2000 Apr; 39(12):1973-9. PubMed ID: 18345096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New methods of data calibration for high power-aperture lidar.
    Guan S; Yang G; Chang Q; Cheng X; Yang Y; Gong S; Wang J
    Opt Express; 2013 Mar; 21(6):7768-85. PubMed ID: 23546158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analyzing the performance of pseudo-random single photon counting ranging Lidar.
    Yu Y; Liu B; Chen Z
    Appl Opt; 2018 Sep; 57(27):7733-7739. PubMed ID: 30462035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lidar-signal compression by photomultiplier gain modulation: influence of detector nonlinearity.
    Bristow MP
    Appl Opt; 1998 Sep; 37(27):6468-79. PubMed ID: 18286154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enabling Value Added Scientific Applications of ICESat-2 Data With Effective Removal of Afterpulses.
    Lu X; Hu Y; Yang Y; Vaughan M; Palm S; Trepte C; Omar A; Lucker P; Baize R
    Earth Space Sci; 2021 Jun; 8(6):e2021EA001729. PubMed ID: 34222563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lidar returns from multiply scattering media in multiple-field-of-view and CCD lidars with polarization devices: comparison of semi-analytical solution and Monte Carlo data.
    Chaikovskaya LI; Zege EP; Katsev IL; Hirschberger M; Oppel UG
    Appl Opt; 2009 Jan; 48(3):623-32. PubMed ID: 19151834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Silicon photomultiplier detector for atmospheric lidar applications.
    Riu J; Sicard M; Royo S; ComerĂ³n A
    Opt Lett; 2012 Apr; 37(7):1229-31. PubMed ID: 22466204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expanding the dynamic range of a lidar receiver by the method of dynode-signal collection.
    Kokhanenko GP; Penner IE; Shamanaev VS
    Appl Opt; 2002 Aug; 41(24):5073-7. PubMed ID: 12206217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Light output measurements and computational models of microcolumnar CsI scintillators for x-ray imaging.
    Nillius P; Klamra W; Sibczynski P; Sharma D; Danielsson M; Badano A
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):600-605. PubMed ID: 28102604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranging performance models based on negative-binomial (NB) distribution for photon-counting lidars.
    Li S; Zhang Z; Ma Y; Zeng H; Zhao P; Zhang W
    Opt Express; 2019 Jun; 27(12):A861-A877. PubMed ID: 31252861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photomultiplier tube calibration based on Na lidar observation and its effect on heat flux bias.
    Liu AZ; Guo Y
    Appl Opt; 2016 Nov; 55(33):9467-9475. PubMed ID: 27869864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poisson signal-detection theory: link between threshold models and the Gaussian assumption.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Nov; 50(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 1788038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of multiple scattering on depolarization measurements with spaceborne lidars.
    Reichardt S; Reichardt J
    Appl Opt; 2003 Jun; 42(18):3620-33. PubMed ID: 12833968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.