BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11922224)

  • 41. Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months.
    Degidi M; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 15747680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Early and immediate restoration and loading of implants in completely edentulous patients.
    Chiapasco M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():76-91. PubMed ID: 15635948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Indications for splinting implant restorations.
    Grossmann Y; Finger IM; Block MS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1642-52. PubMed ID: 16243182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Retrieval analysis on dental implants biointegration phases.
    Ciocan LT; Miculescu F; Miculescu M; Pătraşcu I
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2010; 51(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 20191130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Progressive loading of bone with implant prostheses.
    Misch CE
    J Dent Symp; 1993 Aug; 1():50-3. PubMed ID: 8186839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindric implant ad modum Branemark: is there a relationship? An in vitro study.
    Trisi P; De Benedittis S; Perfetti G; Berardi D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21087320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measurement of submucosal forces transmitted to dental implants.
    Emmer TJ; Emmer TJ; Vaidyanathan J; Vaidyanathan TK
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 10551146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Osseointegration of IMZ implants. Ultrastructural analysis of a case].
    Lopéz Arranz JS; de Vicente Rodriguez JC; Valle Soto ME; Sicilia Felechosa A; Alvarez Alvarez I
    Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1990; 2(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 2094264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bone remodeling and individual-based implant therapy.
    Razzouk S
    N Y State Dent J; 2010 Jan; 76(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 20359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Osseointegrated implant failures.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1999; 45(2):44-51. PubMed ID: 10686922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Remote implant anchorage for the rehabilitation of maxillary defects.
    Parel SM; Brånemark PI; Ohrnell LO; Svensson B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 11677531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part I.
    Weinberg LA
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(6):293-301. PubMed ID: 12498437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of loading on peri-implant bone: a critical review of the literature.
    Duyck J; Vandamme K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Oct; 41(10):783-94. PubMed ID: 24889500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review.
    Sykaras N; Iacopino AM; Marker VA; Triplett RG; Woody RD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):675-90. PubMed ID: 11055135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Biological and clinical rationale for early implant loading.
    Klinger A; Mijiritsky E; Kohavi D
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Jan; 27(1):29-34; quiz 35-6. PubMed ID: 16454013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Preoperative and surgical protocols for better implant integration].
    Takács G
    Int J Dent Symp; 1994; 2(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 9117849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An examination of immediately loaded dental implant stability in the diabetic patient using resonance frequency analysis (RFA).
    Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Apr; 38(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 17432781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Implant placement in patients with oral bisphosphonate therapy: a case series.
    Shabestari GO; Shayesteh YS; Khojasteh A; Alikhasi M; Moslemi N; Aminian A; Masaeli R; Eslami B; Treister NS
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 19438964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [An analysis of the diagnostic criteria in assessing peri-implant tissues. A critical analysis of the literature].
    Weinstein RL; Francetti L; Sironi R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1996 May; 45(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 8926990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dental implant stability from placement to loading.
    Ab Rahmanm S; Al-Juboori MJ; Bin Ismail IH; Chandar PM
    Dent Implantol Update; 2012 Aug; 23(8):61-4. PubMed ID: 22916621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.