74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11922260)
1. A method to assess the clinical outcome of ridge augmentation procedures.
Proussaefs PT; Valencia G; Lozada J; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2002 Mar; 73(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 11922260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using silicone impression material and acrylic resin to fabricate remount casts for removable partial dentures.
Hsu YT; Farmer JB
J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 16011626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method for estimating preoperative bone volume for implant surgery.
Flanagan D
J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 11831232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report.
Zahrani AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants.
Aguilar ML; Elias A; Vizcarrondo CE; Psoter WJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):202-9. PubMed ID: 20362763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials.
Barghi N; Ontiveros JC
Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
