These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11922260)

  • 21. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.
    Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study.
    Rutkunas V; Sveikata K; Savickas R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):512-5. PubMed ID: 22930776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
    Proussaefs P; Lozada J
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using a synthetic nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitution material (Ostim): preliminary clinical and histological results.
    Strietzel FP; Reichart PA; Graf HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):743-51. PubMed ID: 17888015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation.
    Le B; Burstein J; Sedghizadeh PP
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 18332757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Mar; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12705035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
    Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modified fluid wax impression for a severely resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge.
    Tan KM; Singer MT; Masri R; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 19328281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A; Ortorp A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD; Nicholls JI; Yuodelis RA; Brudvik JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.