These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1192266)

  • 1. Studies of an automatic refraction machine.
    Drance SM; Mitchell DW; Schulzer M
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1975 Oct; 10(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 1192266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Results with automatic refraction (author's transl)].
    Holtmann H; Kroll P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1975 Apr; 166(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 1206926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic refraction and the private ophthalmologist: Dioptron II compared with subjective examination.
    Mailer CM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1978 Oct; 13(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 743607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experiences with the automatic refractor "Dioptron" (author's transl)].
    Rassow B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1975 Sep; 167(3):474-5. PubMed ID: 1214428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Composition of the data on optical correction obtained with classical methods and with the Dioptron II].
    Pop M; Cârstocea B; Horge I; Mitrea C; Pop C; Olteanu M
    Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Oftalmol; 1979; 23(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 531283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dioptron-and retinoscopy-subjective discrepancies: effect of age.
    French CN; Nixon JA; Wood IC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1982; 2(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7177649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Value and reliability of an automatic objective refractometer: the Dioptron Nova. A statistical study on computer of 600 measures].
    Poletti J; Courrejou C
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1985 Apr; 85(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 3830459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-way comparison of retinoscopy, subjective, and Dioptron Nova refractive findings.
    Grosvenor T; Perrigin DM; Perrigin J
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Jan; 62(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 3976838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between near retinoscopy and cycloplegic retinoscopy in the refraction of infants and children.
    Saunders KJ; Westall CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Aug; 69(8):615-22. PubMed ID: 1513557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.
    Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Lopez N; Salmon T; Bradley A
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):584-9. PubMed ID: 8942130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of "near retinoscopy" and subjective refraction in adults.
    Mohindra I
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 May; 54(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 900252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method of subjective refraction.
    Humphrey WE
    Buch Augenarzt; 1982; 90():13-21. PubMed ID: 7093775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An automatic objective optometer. Description and clinical evaluation.
    Polse DA; Kerr KE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1975 Mar; 93(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 1094996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction in primary school children in southern Thailand.
    Funarunart P; Tengtrisorn S; Sangsupawanich P; Siangyai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 19530586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
    Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Subjective Refraction.
    Perches S; Collados MV; Ares J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 93(10):1243-53. PubMed ID: 27391538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device.
    Dyson C
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jan; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 849538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.