These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11922934)

  • 1. Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis.
    Anderson JG
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 11922934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation in health informatics: computer simulation.
    Anderson JG
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):151-64. PubMed ID: 11922932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and current use of ASTM/HL7 messages for health care communications in the USA.
    Nelson DA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1993; 6():138-43. PubMed ID: 10163806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'CHEATS': a generic information communication technology (ICT) evaluation framework.
    Shaw NT
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 11922936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness.
    Tjora AH; Scambler G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 19054601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the impact of information communication technologies on complex organizational systems: a multi-disciplinary, multi-method framework.
    Westbrook JI; Braithwaite J; Iedema R; Coiera EW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1323-7. PubMed ID: 15361029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Need to Apply Medical Device Informatics in Developing Standards for Safe Interoperable Medical Systems.
    Weininger S; Jaffe MB; Goldman JM
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jan; 124(1):127-135. PubMed ID: 27584685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues.
    Kaplan B; Shaw NT
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 15227551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MERIT-9: a patient information exchange guideline using MML, HL7 and DICOM.
    Kimura M; Ohe K; Yoshihara H; Ando Y; Kawamata F; Tsuchiya F; Furukawa H; Horiguchi S; Sakusabe T; Tani S; Akiyama M
    Int J Med Inform; 1998 Jul; 51(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 9749900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model-based design of trustworthy health information systems.
    Breu R; Sztipanovits J; Ammenwerth E
    Methods Inf Med; 2008; 47(5):389-91. PubMed ID: 18852911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond effectiveness: the evaluation of information systems using A Comprehensive Health Technology Assessment Framework.
    Kazanjian A; Green CJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 11922933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues to consider before investing in bedside terminal systems.
    Blank M; Bauer A
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1991 Dec; 10(30):1-17. PubMed ID: 10116019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature.
    Lorenzi NM; Riley RT; Blyth AJ; Southon G; Dixon BJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1997; 4(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 9067874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering.
    Kushniruk A
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 11922931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability studies on interactive health information systems; where do we stand?
    Peute LW; Spithoven R; Bakker PJ; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():327-32. PubMed ID: 18487752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collaborative research networks in health: a pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network.
    Robinson TE; Rankin N; Janssen A; Mcgregor D; Grieve S; Shaw T
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2015 Dec; 13():76. PubMed ID: 26652643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standards of medical informatics in Japan.
    Ohyama N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1993; 6():20-4. PubMed ID: 10163816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting qualitative research in health informatics: REQ-HI recommendations.
    Niazkhani Z; Pirnejad H; Aarts J; Adams S; Bal R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():877-81. PubMed ID: 21893872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical assessment of healthcare informatics standards.
    Korpman RA; Dickinson GL
    Int J Med Inform; 1998 Feb; 48(1-3):125-32. PubMed ID: 9600411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation: salvation or nemesis of medical informatics?
    Moehr JR
    Comput Biol Med; 2002 May; 32(3):113-25. PubMed ID: 11922929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.