These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11923506)

  • 1. Water quality. Microbiologists on the trail of polluting bacteria.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5564):2352-3. PubMed ID: 11923506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed.
    Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
    Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of rainfall on the incidence of microbial faecal indicators and the dominant sources of faecal pollution in a Florida river.
    Shehane SD; Harwood VJ; Whitlock JE; Rose JB
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(5):1127-36. PubMed ID: 15836482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence of bacterial pathogens and their anti-microbial resistance in Tilapia and their pond water in Trinidad.
    Newaj-Fyzul A; Mutani A; Ramsubhag A; Adesiyun A
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2008 May; 55(4):206-13. PubMed ID: 18387142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience with the antibiotic resistance analysis and DNA fingerprinting in tracking faecal pollution at two lake beaches.
    Edge TA; Hill S; Stinson G; Seto P; Marsalek J
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(11):51-8. PubMed ID: 18057641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Waterfowl and the bacteriological quality of amenity ponds.
    Abulreesh HH; Paget TA; Goulder R
    J Water Health; 2004 Sep; 2(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 15497814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of septic system failure determined by a bacterial biochemical fingerprinting method.
    Ahmed W; Neller R; Katouli M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):910-20. PubMed ID: 15752338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quo vadis source tracking? Towards a strategic framework for environmental monitoring of fecal pollution.
    Santo Domingo JW; Bambic DG; Edge TA; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3539-52. PubMed ID: 17632210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Source tracking fecal bacteria in water: a critical review of current methods.
    Meays CL; Broersma K; Nordin R; Mazumder A
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Oct; 73(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15327848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emerging microbial and chemical source tracking techniques to identify origins of fecal contamination in waterways.
    Wuertz S; Field J
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3515-6. PubMed ID: 17631937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water quality. Is E. coli distinct enough to join the hunt?
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5564):2353. PubMed ID: 11923507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Isolation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the water of streams subject to different degrees of pollution].
    Antonietti R; Sgorbati P
    Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1976; 27(5):419-28. PubMed ID: 1032154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bacterial contamination and antibiotic resistance in fecal coliforms from glacial water runoff.
    Pathak SP; Gopal K
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 79(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 17541767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of ARA and DNA data for microbial source tracking based on source-classification models developed using classification trees.
    Price B; Venso E; Frana M; Greenberg J; Ware A
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3575-84. PubMed ID: 17599384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of pipe materials and VBNC cells on culturable bacteria in a chlorinated drinking water model system.
    Lee DG; Park SJ; Kim SJ
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):1558-62. PubMed ID: 18062238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First tests show flood waters high in bacteria and lead.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7057):301. PubMed ID: 16163310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sensitivity to antibiotics of bacteria isolated from feces (1961-1967)].
    Kolta F
    Orv Hetil; 1969 Jun; 110(25):1436-42. PubMed ID: 4893365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sourcing faecal pollution from onsite wastewater treatment systems in surface waters using antibiotic resistance analysis.
    Carroll S; Hargreaves M; Goonetilleke A
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):471-82. PubMed ID: 16108788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concepts of fecal streptococci in stream pollution.
    Geldreich EE; Kenner BA
    J Water Pollut Control Fed; 1969 Aug; 41(8):Suppl:R336+. PubMed ID: 4900708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.