These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11923507)

  • 1. Water quality. Is E. coli distinct enough to join the hunt?
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5564):2353. PubMed ID: 11923507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of five rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting methods for differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from humans, poultry and wild birds.
    Mohapatra BR; Broersma K; Mazumder A
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2007 Dec; 277(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 17986090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from poultry and free-living birds by (GTG)5-PCR genomic fingerprinting.
    Mohapatra BR; Broersma K; Mazumder A
    Int J Med Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 298(3-4):245-52. PubMed ID: 17572150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of rep-PCR fingerprinting for genotyping of Escherichia coli strains in Wojnowskie Wschodnie and Wojnowskie Zachodnie lake.
    Baldy-Chudzik K; Niedbach J; Stosik M
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 2001; 50(3-4):233-42. PubMed ID: 11930991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of DGGE community fingerprinting for characterizing Escherichia coli communities associated with fecal pollution.
    Esseili MA; Kassem II; Sigler V
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4467-76. PubMed ID: 18775549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic diversity of Escherichia coli recovered from the oral cavity of beef cattle and their relatedness to faecal E. coli.
    Aslam M; Greer GG; Nattress FM; Gill CO; McMullen LM
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2004; 39(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 15548305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetitive element (REP)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of Escherichia coli isolates from recreational waters of southeastern Lake Huron.
    Kon T; Weir SC; Howell ET; Lee H; Trevors JT
    Can J Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19370070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple lines of evidence to identify the sources of fecal pollution at a freshwater beach in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario.
    Edge TA; Hill S
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3585-94. PubMed ID: 17575998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli in a dairy farm.
    Son I; Van Kessel JA; Karns JS
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Sep; 6(7):837-47. PubMed ID: 19459756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Escherichia coli causing extraintestinal infections.
    Manges AR; Tellis PA; Vincent C; Lifeso K; Geneau G; Reid-Smith RJ; Boerlin P
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Nov; 79(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 19765619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.
    Hassan WM; Ellender RD; Wang SY
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):591-8. PubMed ID: 17241366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of septic system failure determined by a bacterial biochemical fingerprinting method.
    Ahmed W; Neller R; Katouli M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):910-20. PubMed ID: 15752338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wildlife identified as major source of Escherichia coli in agriculturally dominated watersheds by BOX A1R-derived genetic fingerprints.
    Somarelli JA; Makarewicz JC; Sia R; Simon R
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 16551490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hygienic quality of lakes which are used as open-air bath. 2. Communication: Comparison of biochemical typed Escherichia coli strains isolated from lake water and bird excrements (author's transl)].
    Dott W; Wolff HJ; Botzenhart K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1981; 173(3-4):233-41. PubMed ID: 7029972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population structure of Cladophora-borne Escherichia coli in nearshore water of Lake Michigan.
    Byappanahalli MN; Whitman RL; Shively DA; Ferguson J; Ishii S; Sadowsky MJ
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3649-54. PubMed ID: 17451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
    Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Escherichia coli shedding patterns in humans and dogs: insights into within-household transmission of phylotypes associated with urinary tract infections.
    Damborg P; Nielsen SS; Guardabassi L
    Epidemiol Infect; 2009 Oct; 137(10):1457-64. PubMed ID: 19272200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sourcing faecal pollution: a combination of library-dependent and library-independent methods to identify human faecal pollution in non-sewered catchments.
    Ahmed W; Stewart J; Gardner T; Powell D; Brooks P; Sullivan D; Tindale N
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3771-9. PubMed ID: 17482658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with the antibiotic resistance analysis and DNA fingerprinting in tracking faecal pollution at two lake beaches.
    Edge TA; Hill S; Stinson G; Seto P; Marsalek J
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(11):51-8. PubMed ID: 18057641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
    Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.