398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11923823)
1. European Union in disarray over GM seeds.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 11923823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
Craddock N
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
Shand H
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Flawed science underlies laws on transgenic crops.
Sandermann H
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):613. PubMed ID: 12904760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bogged down in CAP reform.
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National politicians block GM progress.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):918-9. PubMed ID: 10973199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. European disarray on transgenic crops.
Abbott A
Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):946. PubMed ID: 19238685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.
Kok EJ; Kuiper HA
Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):439-44. PubMed ID: 14512230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
König A
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified food.
Celec P; Kukucková M; Renczésová V; Natarajan S; Pálffy R; Gardlík R; Hodosy J; Behuliak M; Vlková B; Minárik G; Szemes T; Stuchlík S; Turna J
Biomed Pharmacother; 2005 Dec; 59(10):531-40. PubMed ID: 16298508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Italian GMO ban could spread.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1137-8. PubMed ID: 11062425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. GM crops: science, politics and communication.
Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. GM crops in Africa: challenges in Egypt.
Abdallah N
GM Crops; 2010; 1(3):116-9. PubMed ID: 21844668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
Devos Y; Demont M; Sanvido O
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1223-5. PubMed ID: 18997757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
Smyth S; McHughen A
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
