BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11924798)

  • 1. Use of genetically modified mouse models for evaluation of carcinogenic risk: considerations for the laboratory animal scientist.
    Recio L; Everitt J
    Comp Med; 2001 Oct; 51(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 11924798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The utility of genetically modified mouse assays for identifying human carcinogens: a basic understanding and path forward. The Alternatives to Carcinogenicity Testing Committee ILSI HESI.
    MacDonald J; French JE; Gerson RJ; Goodman J; Inoue T; Jacobs A; Kasper P; Keller D; Lavin A; Long G; McCullough B; Sistare FD; Storer R; van der Laan JW
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Feb; 77(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 14657512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Xpa-deficient transgenic mouse model for short-term carcinogenicity testing: 9-month studies with haloperidol, reserpine, phenacetin, and D-mannitol.
    Lina BA; Woutersen RA; Bruijntjes JP; van Benthem J; van den Berg JA; Monbaliu J; Thoolen BJ; Beems RB; van Kreijl CF
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 15200157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The transgenic mouse assay as an alternative test method for regulatory carcinogenicity studies--implications for REACH.
    Wells MY; Williams ES
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 19126422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens in Xpc(-/-)p53(+/-) mice.
    Melis JP; Speksnijder EN; Kuiper RV; Salvatori DC; Schaap MM; Maas S; Robinson J; Verhoef A; van Benthem J; Luijten M; van Steeg H
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 266(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 23153559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The use of biotechnological recombinant-mice in biological safety research].
    Inoue T
    Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku; 1996; (114):1-12. PubMed ID: 9037857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetically altered mouse models for identifying carcinogens.
    Tennant RW; Stasiewicz S; Mennear J; French JE; Spalding JW
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):123-50. PubMed ID: 10353386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The program for phenotyping of genetically modified animals at AstraZeneca.
    Berg AL; Bohlooly-Y M
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2006 Jul; 57(5-6):383-4. PubMed ID: 16709449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finding transcriptomics biomarkers for in vivo identification of (non-)genotoxic carcinogens using wild-type and Xpa/p53 mutant mouse models.
    Jonker MJ; Bruning O; van Iterson M; Schaap MM; van der Hoeven TV; Vrieling H; Beems RB; de Vries A; van Steeg H; Breit TM; Luijten M
    Carcinogenesis; 2009 Oct; 30(10):1805-12. PubMed ID: 19696161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of transgenic animals for carcinogenicity testing: considerations and implications for risk assessment.
    Gulezian D; Jacobson-Kram D; McCullough CB; Olson H; Recio L; Robinson D; Storer R; Tennant R; Ward JM; Neumann DA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2000; 28(3):482-99. PubMed ID: 10862569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of rasH2 transgenic mice for carcinogenesis testing of medical implants.
    Palazzi X; Kergozien-Framery S
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2009 Sep; 61(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 19062264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigations of clofibrate in alternative carcinogenicity models.
    Santostefano MJ; Hoivik DJ; Miller RT
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):285-8. PubMed ID: 16257848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation on carcinogenicity of chemicals using transgenic mice.
    Mitsumori K
    Toxicology; 2002 Dec; 181-182():241-4. PubMed ID: 12505318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between UV-induced mutant p53 patches and skin tumours, analysed by mutation spectra and by induction kinetics in various DNA-repair-deficient mice.
    Rebel H; Kram N; Westerman A; Banus S; van Kranen HJ; de Gruijl FR
    Carcinogenesis; 2005 Dec; 26(12):2123-30. PubMed ID: 16051635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioural phenotyping of transgenic mice.
    Brown RE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 18266509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studies evaluating the utility of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea as a positive control in carcinogenicity studies in the p53+/- mouse.
    Hoivik DJ; Allen JS; Wall HG; Nold JB; Miller RT; Santostefano MJ
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(5):349-56. PubMed ID: 16257854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mouse models of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Daugherty A; Cassis LA
    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2004 Mar; 24(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 14739119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the levels of enzymes involved in drug metabolism between transgenic or gene-knockout and the parental mice.
    Ariyoshi N; Imaoka S; Nakayama K; Takahashi Y; Fujita K; Funae Y; Kamataki T
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():161-72. PubMed ID: 11695553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.