398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11925560)
1. Biotechnology patents: strategies for meeting economic and ethical concerns.
Gold ER
Nat Genet; 2002 Apr; 30(4):359. PubMed ID: 11925560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Europe's patent rebellion.
Wadman M
Fortune; 2001 Oct; 144(6):44. PubMed ID: 11586878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology. Lawsuit challenges legal basis for patenting human genes.
Marshall E
Science; 2009 May; 324(5930):1000-1. PubMed ID: 19460975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Equivalents in biotechnology patents.
Auer HE
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 12610574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics.
Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A
Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ruling on BRCA gene patents could have limited impact.
Goozner M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Jun; 102(11):754-7. PubMed ID: 20498427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US Supreme Court decision could compromise biotech patents.
Robertson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 May; 19(5):394. PubMed ID: 11328981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomedical patents and ethics: a Canadian solution.
Gold ER
McGill Law J; 2000 May; 45(2):413-35. PubMed ID: 12688288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. European patents. Tough stance on stem cell, DNA claims.
Vogel G
Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5582):754-5. PubMed ID: 12161624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. French researchers take a stand against cancer gene patent.
Butler D; Goodman S
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):95-6. PubMed ID: 11557932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
Robertson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic patents: gatekeeper to the promised cures.
Westin LP
Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2002; 25(1):271-99. PubMed ID: 15164741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How many lawyers does it take...greed and legal wrangling could stifle the medical revolution.
New Sci; 2002 May; 174(2343):3. PubMed ID: 12731531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. It's all about cures and cash. How the winner of the race to patent human genes may strike it rich.
Sherrid P
US News World Rep; 2001 Jan; 130(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 11189705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Super-enzyme patents get their day in court.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):767. PubMed ID: 12397315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US to rule on research patent.
Ruttimann J
Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7084):587. PubMed ID: 16572133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intellectual property. Supreme Court rules out patents on 'natural' genes.
Marshall E
Science; 2013 Jun; 340(6139):1387-8. PubMed ID: 23788772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biotech patents-business as usual?
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1326. PubMed ID: 19060861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.
Summers TM
Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostics firms face new patent claim worries.
Allison M
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 27(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 19587651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
