BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11925800)

  • 1. [Physical diagnosis--digital rectal examination].
    van Driel MF; van Andel MV; ten Cate Hoedemaker HO; Wolf RF; Mensink HJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Mar; 146(11):508-12. PubMed ID: 11925800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in detecting carcinoma prostate.
    Iqbal N; Bhatti AN; Husain S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):340-2. PubMed ID: 12814533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer.
    Galić J; Karner I; Cenan L; Tucak A; Hegedus I; Pasini J; Bilandzija-Peranović M; Mihaljević S
    Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():61-6. PubMed ID: 12955893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finasteride improves the sensitivity of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection.
    Thompson IM; Tangen CM; Goodman PJ; Lucia MS; Parnes HL; Lippman SM; Coltman CA
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1749-52. PubMed ID: 17437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underutilization of digital rectal examination when screening for prostate cancer.
    Murthy GD; Byron DP; Pasquale D
    Arch Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 164(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 14769627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy.
    Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of digital rectal examination on serum levels of prostatic-specific antigen.
    Brawer MK; Schifman RB; Ahmann FR; Ahmann ME; Coulis KM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Nov; 112(11):1110-2. PubMed ID: 2460065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea?
    Sutton MA; Gibbons RP; Correa RJ
    West J Med; 1991 Jul; 155(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1877229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [What is the value of digital rectal examination?].
    Lebiedz P; Kucharzik T
    Med Klin (Munich); 2004 Dec; 99(12):735-9; quiz 740-1. PubMed ID: 15599684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low prostate specific antigen levels and normal digital rectal examination--a report on a follow up cohort in general practice.
    Brett T
    Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Apr; 34(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 15861761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Uncommon initial symptoms of metastasized carcinoma of the prostate].
    Wymenga LF; Mensink HJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Oct; 143(42):2081-6. PubMed ID: 10560555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of free to total prostate specific antigen ratio in serum in the diagnosis of prostatic enlargement.
    Bhuiyan AK; Kibria SA; Subhan SS
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2004 Aug; 30(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15813483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percent free prostate specific antigen in the total prostate specific antigen 2 to 4 ng./ml. range does not substantially increase the number of biopsies needed to detect clinically significant prostate cancer compared to the 4 to 10 ng./ml. range.
    Haese A; Dworschack RT; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 12131298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biopsy indication--a predictor of pathologic stage among men with preoperative serum PSA levels of 4.0 ng/mL or less and T1c disease.
    Freedland SJ; Mangold LA; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):887-91. PubMed ID: 15134972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.
    Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA
    Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The electromagnetic detection of prostatic cancer: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
    Tubaro A; De Nunzio C; Trucchi A; Stoppacciaro A; Miano L
    Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 18336888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is routine digital rectal examination required for the followup of prostate cancer?
    Warren KS; McFarlane JP
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 17499293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screening of the prostate cancer. "lnstantaneous" of a daily practice among 300 general practitioners of the canton of Vaud].
    Praz V; Jichlinski P; Aymon D; Leisinger HJ
    Rev Med Suisse; 2005 Dec; 1(44):2840-2. PubMed ID: 16382715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time-resolved fluorescence-based PCA3 test on urinary sediments after digital rectal examination; a Dutch multicenter validation of the diagnostic performance.
    van Gils MP; Hessels D; van Hooij O; Jannink SA; Peelen WP; Hanssen SL; Witjes JA; Cornel EB; Karthaus HF; Smits GA; Dijkman GA; Mulders PF; Schalken JA
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 13(3):939-43. PubMed ID: 17289888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High concordance of gene methylation in post-digital rectal examination and post-biopsy urine samples for prostate cancer detection.
    Rogers CG; Gonzalgo ML; Yan G; Bastian PJ; Chan DY; Nelson WG; Pavlovich CP
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2280-4. PubMed ID: 17070312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.