These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11925800)
1. [Physical diagnosis--digital rectal examination]. van Driel MF; van Andel MV; ten Cate Hoedemaker HO; Wolf RF; Mensink HJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Mar; 146(11):508-12. PubMed ID: 11925800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in detecting carcinoma prostate. Iqbal N; Bhatti AN; Husain S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Jun; 13(6):340-2. PubMed ID: 12814533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer. Galić J; Karner I; Cenan L; Tucak A; Hegedus I; Pasini J; Bilandzija-Peranović M; Mihaljević S Coll Antropol; 2003; 27 Suppl 1():61-6. PubMed ID: 12955893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finasteride improves the sensitivity of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection. Thompson IM; Tangen CM; Goodman PJ; Lucia MS; Parnes HL; Lippman SM; Coltman CA J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1749-52. PubMed ID: 17437804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Underutilization of digital rectal examination when screening for prostate cancer. Murthy GD; Byron DP; Pasquale D Arch Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 164(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 14769627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy. Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of digital rectal examination on serum levels of prostatic-specific antigen. Brawer MK; Schifman RB; Ahmann FR; Ahmann ME; Coulis KM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Nov; 112(11):1110-2. PubMed ID: 2460065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea? Sutton MA; Gibbons RP; Correa RJ West J Med; 1991 Jul; 155(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 1877229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [What is the value of digital rectal examination?]. Lebiedz P; Kucharzik T Med Klin (Munich); 2004 Dec; 99(12):735-9; quiz 740-1. PubMed ID: 15599684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Low prostate specific antigen levels and normal digital rectal examination--a report on a follow up cohort in general practice. Brett T Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Apr; 34(4):301-2. PubMed ID: 15861761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Uncommon initial symptoms of metastasized carcinoma of the prostate]. Wymenga LF; Mensink HJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Oct; 143(42):2081-6. PubMed ID: 10560555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of free to total prostate specific antigen ratio in serum in the diagnosis of prostatic enlargement. Bhuiyan AK; Kibria SA; Subhan SS Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2004 Aug; 30(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15813483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Percent free prostate specific antigen in the total prostate specific antigen 2 to 4 ng./ml. range does not substantially increase the number of biopsies needed to detect clinically significant prostate cancer compared to the 4 to 10 ng./ml. range. Haese A; Dworschack RT; Partin AW J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 12131298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biopsy indication--a predictor of pathologic stage among men with preoperative serum PSA levels of 4.0 ng/mL or less and T1c disease. Freedland SJ; Mangold LA; Epstein JI; Partin AW Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):887-91. PubMed ID: 15134972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL. Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The electromagnetic detection of prostatic cancer: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Tubaro A; De Nunzio C; Trucchi A; Stoppacciaro A; Miano L Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 18336888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is routine digital rectal examination required for the followup of prostate cancer? Warren KS; McFarlane JP J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 17499293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Screening of the prostate cancer. "lnstantaneous" of a daily practice among 300 general practitioners of the canton of Vaud]. Praz V; Jichlinski P; Aymon D; Leisinger HJ Rev Med Suisse; 2005 Dec; 1(44):2840-2. PubMed ID: 16382715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The time-resolved fluorescence-based PCA3 test on urinary sediments after digital rectal examination; a Dutch multicenter validation of the diagnostic performance. van Gils MP; Hessels D; van Hooij O; Jannink SA; Peelen WP; Hanssen SL; Witjes JA; Cornel EB; Karthaus HF; Smits GA; Dijkman GA; Mulders PF; Schalken JA Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 13(3):939-43. PubMed ID: 17289888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High concordance of gene methylation in post-digital rectal examination and post-biopsy urine samples for prostate cancer detection. Rogers CG; Gonzalgo ML; Yan G; Bastian PJ; Chan DY; Nelson WG; Pavlovich CP J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2280-4. PubMed ID: 17070312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]