199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11925800)
21. Diagnosis of malignancy of prostate.
Kapoor N; Surange S; Gupta KN; Husainy MA; Faizi M
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 47(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 16295464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Apoptotic regulators in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): value in prostate cancer detection and prevention.
Zeng L; Kyprianou N
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2005; 8(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 15477876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Effects of digital rectal examination on serum prostate specific antigen].
Nord MP; Cluzeł P; Vionnet A
Presse Med; 1996 Apr; 25(12):577-80. PubMed ID: 8657671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The detection rate of prostate cancer in different prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in Chinese men].
Li M; Na YQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 88(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 18346372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Prostate specific antigen and diagnosis of prostate cancer].
Rigaud J; Bouchot O
Rev Prat; 2003 Dec; 53(20):2229-36. PubMed ID: 15018076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The digital rectal exam: still useful after all these years?
Harv Mens Health Watch; 2002 Aug; 7(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 12217820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Complexed prostate specific antigen density is better than the other PSA derivatives for detection of prostate cancer in men with total PSA between 2.5 and 20 ng/ml: results of a prospective multicenter study.
Sözen S; Eskicorapci S; Küpeli B; Irkilata L; Altinel M; Ozer G; Uygur C; Alkibay T; Ozen H
Eur Urol; 2005 Mar; 47(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 15716190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Taking a closer look at the rectal examination: beyond the basics.
Deshpande AR; Block N; Barkin JS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 104(1):246-7; author reply 247. PubMed ID: 19098881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The digital rectal examination in pediatric trauma: a pilot study.
Kristinsson G; Wall SP; Crain EF
J Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 32(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17239734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variables in detecting impalpable prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL: transabdominal measurement makes a significant contribution.
Kobayashi T; Kawahara T; Nishizawa K; Ogura K; Mitsumori K; Ide Y
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1245-8. PubMed ID: 15892809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prostate-specific antigen testing in general practice: a survey among 325 general practitioners in Denmark.
Jønler M; Eddy B; Poulsen J
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2005; 39(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 16118092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Specificity of serum prostate-specific antigen determination in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
Määttänen L; Hakama M; Tammela TL; Ruutu M; Ala-Opas M; Juusela H; Martikainen P; Stenman UH; Auvinen A
Br J Cancer; 2007 Jan; 96(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 17213825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive modeling for the presence of prostate carcinoma using clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound parameters in patients with prostate specific antigen levels < or = 10 ng/mL.
Garzotto M; Hudson RG; Peters L; Hsieh YC; Barrera E; Mori M; Beer TM; Klein T
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 14508828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH
Prostate; 2007 Feb; 67(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17044079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validity of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the estimation of prostate volume in community-based men aged 50 to 78 years: the Krimpen Study.
Bosch JL; Bohnen AM; Groeneveld FP
Eur Urol; 2004 Dec; 46(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 15548443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The accuracy of clinical examination in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception.
Karlbom U; Graf W; Nilsson S; Påhlman L
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Sep; 47(9):1533-8. PubMed ID: 15486753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hormonal predictors of prostate cancer.
Sofikerim M; Eskicorapci S; Oruç O; Ozen H
Urol Int; 2007; 79(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17627161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men.
Agalliu I; Weiss NS; Lin DW; Stanford JL
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Nov; 18(9):931-7. PubMed ID: 17641982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PCA3 urine mRNA testing for prostate carcinoma: patterns of use by community urologists and assay performance in reference laboratory setting.
Shappell SB; Fulmer J; Arguello D; Wright BS; Oppenheimer JR; Putzi MJ
Urology; 2009 Feb; 73(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 18995890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
