These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11927052)

  • 21. Prospective derivation of a clinical decision rule for thoracolumbar spine evaluation after blunt trauma: An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Group Study.
    Inaba K; Nosanov L; Menaker J; Bosarge P; Williams L; Turay D; Cachecho R; de Moya M; Bukur M; Carl J; Kobayashi L; Kaminski S; Beekley A; Gomez M; Skiada D;
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Mar; 78(3):459-65; discussion 465-7. PubMed ID: 25710414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variation in emergency department use of cervical spine radiography for alert, stable trauma patients.
    Stiell IG; Wells GA; Vandemheen K; Laupacis A; Brison R; Eisenhauer MA; Greenberg GH; MacPhail I; McKnight RD; Reardon M; Verbeek R; Worthington J; Lesiuk H
    CMAJ; 1997 Jun; 156(11):1537-44. PubMed ID: 9176419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-spine rule.
    Brehaut JC; Stiell IG; Graham ID
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Apr; 13(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 16531607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Canadian C-Spine Rule.
    Saragiotto BT; Michaleff ZA
    J Physiother; 2016 Jul; 62(3):170. PubMed ID: 27161303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries.
    Brehaut JC; Graham ID; Wood TJ; Taljaard M; Eagles D; Lott A; Clement C; Kelly AM; Mason S; Stiell IG
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 20042533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration.
    Moser N; Lemeunier N; Southerst D; Shearer H; Murnaghan K; Sutton D; Côté P
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1219-1233. PubMed ID: 28940048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Canadian C-spine rule.
    Hall FM
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1467-9; author reply 1467-9. PubMed ID: 15074005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re: Imaging of acute injuries of the cervical spine: value of plain radiography, CT, and MR imaging.
    Bloom AI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):218. PubMed ID: 8571892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Physical examination can exclude clinically important cervical spine injury.
    Lynch RM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Jun; 43(6):788-9. PubMed ID: 15259166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical criteria to rule out cervical-spine injury.
    April RS; Lanfranchi R
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(18):1339. PubMed ID: 11183569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acute cervical spine injuries: prospective MR imaging assessment at a level 1 trauma center.
    Katzberg RW; Benedetti PF; Drake CM; Ivanovic M; Levine RA; Beatty CS; Nemzek WR; McFall RA; Ontell FK; Bishop DM; Poirier VC; Chong BW
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 10540663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nexus cervical spine criteria.
    Vinson DR
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Feb; 37(2):237-8. PubMed ID: 11174248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Evaluation of cervical spine injuries with special consideration of combined damages].
    Lorenz R
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1966 Jun; 104(6):808-20. PubMed ID: 6008814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The NEXUS criteria: do they stand the test of time?
    Collins NC; McKenzie JV
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 20(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 22228252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement techniques for lower cervical spine injuries: consensus statement of the Spine Trauma Study Group.
    Bono CM; Vaccaro AR; Fehlings M; Fisher C; Dvorak M; Ludwig S; Harrop J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 16508560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clearing the cervical spine of adult victims of trauma.
    Clancy MJ
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 May; 16(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 10353050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The intrinsic fallibility of clinical judgment.
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Sep; 42(3):403-4. PubMed ID: 12944894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imaging of acute cervical spine trauma: when to obtain which modality.
    Ulbrich EJ; Carrino JA; Sturzenegger M; Farshad M
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2013 Sep; 17(4):380-8. PubMed ID: 24101178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Injuries of the cervical spine].
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1972 Dec; 110(6):943-5. PubMed ID: 4264960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. NEXUS study needs Canadian results.
    Pauls M; Watson ML
    Can Fam Physician; 2002 Oct; 48():1610. PubMed ID: 12449543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.