These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11928018)

  • 1. Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks.
    Nio D; Bemelman WA; Boer KT; Dunker MS; Gouma DJ; Gulik TM
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 11928018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
    Dakin GF; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic vascular anastomoses in an experimental model.
    Nio D; Balm R; Maartense S; Guijt M; Bemelman WA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 27(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 14760597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system.
    Hubens G; Coveliers H; Balliu L; Ruppert M; Vaneerdeweg W
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1595-9. PubMed ID: 12874678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks.
    Garcia-Ruiz A; Gagner M; Miller JH; Steiner CP; Hahn JF
    Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):957-61. PubMed ID: 9749847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotically assisted minimally invasive biliary surgery in a porcine model.
    Sweeney T; Rattner DW
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):138-41. PubMed ID: 11961624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic surgery and resident training.
    De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
    Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy.
    Jourdan IC; Dutson E; Garcia A; Vleugels T; Leroy J; Mutter D; Marescaux J
    Br J Surg; 2004 Jul; 91(7):879-85. PubMed ID: 15227695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of lightly embalmed (fresh tissue) cadavers for resident laparoscopic training.
    Levine RL; Kives S; Cathey G; Blinchevsky A; Acland R; Thompson C; Pasic R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 16962531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic brachytherapy for lung cancer: comparison of the ZEUS robot, VATS, and manual seed implantation.
    Ma GW; Pytel M; Trejos AL; Hornblower V; Smallwood J; Patel R; Fenster A; Malthaner RA
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Sep; 12(5):270-7. PubMed ID: 17957534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis.
    Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb; 17(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12399841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children.
    Lehnert M; Richter B; Beyer PA; Heller K
    J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Aug; 41(8):1392-6. PubMed ID: 16863843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
    Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
    J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption.
    Maniar HS; Council ML; Prasad SM; Prasad SM; Chu C; Damiano RJ
    J Surg Res; 2005 May; 125(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15836846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized comparison of conventional vs articulating laparoscopic needle-drivers for performing standardized suturing tasks by laparoscopy-naive subjects.
    Tuncel A; Lucas S; Bensalah K; Zeltser IS; Jenkins A; Saeedi O; Park S; Cadeddu JA
    BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(6):727-30. PubMed ID: 17868415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of haptic learning in telemanipulator-assisted surgery.
    Jacobs S; Holzhey D; Strauss G; Burgert O; Falk V
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Oct; 17(5):402-6. PubMed ID: 18049401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.