These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11928228)

  • 1. [The right to be aborted].
    Sureau C
    Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg; 2001; 156(5-6):237-46; discussion 247-8. PubMed ID: 11928228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Leg amputation as a result of attempted voluntary abortion].
    Quéreux C; Soutoul JH; Ritter P; Pierre F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 1869788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Is there still a future for the French "Perruche" jurisprudence?].
    Manaouil C; Jardé O
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Feb; 40(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 22266393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comments on the Lambert case: the rulings of the French Conseil d'État and the European Court of Human Rights.
    Veshi D
    Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Jun; 20(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 27581426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Children not meant to be: protecting the interests of the child when abortion results in live birth.
    Casagrande KM
    Quinnipiac Health Law J; 2002; 6(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 16180297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Urology facing the courts. The basis of professional responsibility].
    Haertig A; Haillot O; Chopin G
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1989; 23(6):546-9. PubMed ID: 2619269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The male abortion: the putative father's right to terminate his interests in and obligations to the unborn child.
    McCulley MG
    J Law Policy; 1988; 7(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 12666677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Created equal: how the Declaration of Independence recognizes and guarantees the right to life for the unborn.
    Trapp M
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2001; 28(4):819-47. PubMed ID: 16528851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Actions for wrongful birth and wrongful life.
    Seymour J
    N Z Bioeth J; 2001 Feb; 2(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 15586987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It's a wonderful life: is it possible to say that a severely disabled child has been harmed by the mere fact of being born?
    Perry R
    Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Nov; 93(2):329-400. PubMed ID: 18354869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High court gives states more freedom to require consent in teen abortions.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1993 Nov; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12345223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prudent warnings and imprudent reactions: "judicial usurpation" and the unraveling of rights.
    Arkes H
    Hum Life Rev; 2002; 28(4):7-38. PubMed ID: 12751489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.