These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11928691)

  • 1. Genetic programming over context-free languages with linear constraints for the knapsack problem: first results.
    Bruhn P; Geyer-Schulz A
    Evol Comput; 2002; 10(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 11928691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GASAT: a genetic local search algorithm for the satisfiability problem.
    Lardeux F; Saubion F; Hao JK
    Evol Comput; 2006; 14(2):223-53. PubMed ID: 16831107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the suitability of different representations of solid catalysts for combinatorial library design by genetic algorithms.
    Gobin OC; Schüth F
    J Comb Chem; 2008; 10(6):835-46. PubMed ID: 18693763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling and efficient optimization for object-based scalability and some related problems.
    Batra P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2000; 9(10):1677-92. PubMed ID: 18262907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multidimensional knapsack problem: a fitness landscape analysis.
    Tavares J; Pereira FB; Costa E
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Jun; 38(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 18558527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical analysis of locality, heritability and heuristic bias in evolutionary algorithms: a case study for the multidimensional knapsack problem.
    Raidl GR; Gottlieb J
    Evol Comput; 2005; 13(4):441-75. PubMed ID: 16297279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Game dynamics with learning and evolution of universal grammar.
    Mitchener WG
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Apr; 69(3):1093-118. PubMed ID: 17265122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: example of planning choice in transportation.
    Zhong T; Young R
    Eval Program Plann; 2010 May; 33(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19596437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined genetic algorithm and multiple linear regression (GA-MLR) optimizer: Application to multi-exponential fluorescence decay surface.
    Fisz JJ
    J Phys Chem A; 2006 Dec; 110(48):12977-85. PubMed ID: 17134156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An alternative approach for neural network evolution with a genetic algorithm: crossover by combinatorial optimization.
    García-Pedrajas N; Ortiz-Boyer D; Hervás-Martínez C
    Neural Netw; 2006 May; 19(4):514-28. PubMed ID: 16343847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Error thresholds in genetic algorithms.
    Ochoa G
    Evol Comput; 2006; 14(2):157-82. PubMed ID: 16831105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic Parallel Programming: design and implementation.
    Cheang SM; Leung KS; Lee KH
    Evol Comput; 2006; 14(2):129-56. PubMed ID: 16831104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On complexity of optimal recombination for binary representations of solutions.
    Eremeev AV
    Evol Comput; 2008; 16(1):127-47. PubMed ID: 18386998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A filter-based evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization.
    Clevenger L; Ferguson L; Hart WE
    Evol Comput; 2005; 13(3):329-52. PubMed ID: 16156927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular solutions to the binary integer programming problem based on DNA computation.
    Yeh CW; Chu CP; Wu KR
    Biosystems; 2006 Jan; 83(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 16229936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PC Software for Artificial Intelligence Applications.
    Epp H; Kalin M; Miller D
    Science; 1988 May; 240(4853):824-30. PubMed ID: 17741465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The hierarchical fair competition (HFC) framework for sustainable evolutionary algorithms.
    Hu J; Goodman E; Seo K; Fan Z; Rosenberg R
    Evol Comput; 2005; 13(2):241-77. PubMed ID: 15969902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing the rate at which languages lose the influence of a common ancestor.
    Rafferty AN; Griffiths TL; Klein D
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1406-31. PubMed ID: 24646114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of bloat control methods for genetic programming.
    Luke S; Panait L
    Evol Comput; 2006; 14(3):309-44. PubMed ID: 16903796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic detection of subsystem/pathway variants in genome analysis.
    Ye Y; Osterman A; Overbeek R; Godzik A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i478-86. PubMed ID: 15961494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.