These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11928734)

  • 1. Summaries for patients. Initial evaluation of rectal bleeding in young persons: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):I30. PubMed ID: 11928734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial evaluation of rectal bleeding in young persons: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Lewis JD; Brown A; Localio AR; Schwartz JS
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 11790061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.
    Allen E; Nicolaidis C; Helfand M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jan; 20(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 15693933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach.
    Wong SS; Leong AP; Leong TY
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audit on flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding in a district general hospital: are we over-loading the resources?
    Mathew J; Shankar P; Aldean IM
    Postgrad Med J; 2004 Jan; 80(939):38-40. PubMed ID: 14760179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for evaluation of symptomatic patients without evidence of bleeding.
    Rex DK; Mark D; Clarke B; Lappas JC; Lehman GA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Aug; 42(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7590048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations of combined flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema in patients with rectal bleeding.
    Hixson LJ; Sampliner RE; Chernin M; Amberg J; Kogan F
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 2591391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anorectal bleeding: etiology, evaluation, and management (with videos).
    Daram SR; Lahr C; Tang SJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):406-17. PubMed ID: 22817792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hospital costs of diagnostic procedures for colorectal cancer.
    Walker AR; Whynes DK; Chamberlain JO; Hardcastle JD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(9):907-14. PubMed ID: 1890433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Summaries for patients. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jul; 137(2):I38. PubMed ID: 12118986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and therapy of the patient with fecal occult blood loss: a decision analysis.
    Lashner BA; Silverstein MD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Sep; 85(9):1088-95. PubMed ID: 2117850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for colon cancer.
    Heiken JP
    Cancer Imaging; 2006 Oct; 6(Spec No A):S13-21. PubMed ID: 17114066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for colon cancer: economics and related considerations.
    Gelfand DW
    Semin Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 31(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 8848734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of rectal bleeding.
    Lancet; 1989 Jan; 1(8631):195-7. PubMed ID: 2563102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Rex DK; Weddle RA; Lehman GA; Pound DC; O'Connor KW; Hawes RH; Dittus RS; Lappas JC; Lumeng L
    Gastroenterology; 1990 Apr; 98(4):855-61. PubMed ID: 2107112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colonoscopy evaluations: justification by cost?
    Rex DK; Mark D; Clarke B; Lappas JC; Lehman GA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Mar; 91(3):614-5. PubMed ID: 8633528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding.
    Irvine EJ; O'Connor J; Frost RA; Shorvon P; Somers S; Stevenson GW; Hunt RH
    Gut; 1988 Sep; 29(9):1188-93. PubMed ID: 3273756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in use of barium enema examination, colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy: is use commensurate with risk of disease?
    Karasick S; Ehrlich SM; Levin DC; Harford RJ; Rosetti EF; Ricci JA; Beam LM; Gigliotti JV
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 7754010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for colorectal cancer: the cost to find an advanced adenoma.
    McGrath JS; Ponich TP; Gregor JC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Nov; 97(11):2902-7. PubMed ID: 12425566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.