These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11928736)

  • 1. Summaries for patients. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding.
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):I47. PubMed ID: 11928736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey.
    Müllner M; Matthews H; Altman DG
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 11790063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical standards.
    Thompson J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1992 Feb; 76(2):126. PubMed ID: 1739711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.
    Stratton IM; Neil A
    Diabet Med; 2005 Apr; 22(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 15787658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The importance of analysis in published evidence levels].
    Bernardo WM
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2011; 57(1):1. PubMed ID: 21390444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical Analysis and Reporting Guidelines for CHEST.
    Kattan MW; Vickers AJ
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S3-S11. PubMed ID: 32658650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis.
    Goodman S; Greenland S
    PLoS Med; 2007 Apr; 4(4):e168. PubMed ID: 17456002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error message.
    Vaux DL
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):799. PubMed ID: 15103350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical methodologies and incidence of appropriate statistical testing in orthopaedic spine literature. Are statistics misleading?
    Vrbos LA; Lorenz MA; Peabody EH; McGregor M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Jun; 18(8):1021-9. PubMed ID: 8367770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiparous species present problems (and possibilities) to developmentalists.
    Zorrilla EP
    Dev Psychobiol; 1997 Mar; 30(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 9068968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Checklists work to improve science.
    Nature; 2018 Apr; 556(7701):273-274. PubMed ID: 30967653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical flaw trips up study of bad stats.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7110):379. PubMed ID: 17006479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It is all in the numbers.
    Glantz SA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):835-7. PubMed ID: 8436765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):713-21. PubMed ID: 20546823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on journal guidelines for reporting statistics.
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2005 Apr; 32(4):324-6. PubMed ID: 15811000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proper analysis in clinical trials: how to report and adjust for missing outcome data.
    Joshi M; Royuela A; Zamora J
    BJOG; 2013 Jul; 120(8):915-9. PubMed ID: 23759083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal.
    McCance I
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Sep; 72(9):322-8. PubMed ID: 8585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manuscript review from a statistician's perspective.
    Vaisrub N
    JAMA; 1985 Jun; 253(21):3145-7. PubMed ID: 3999302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery.
    Orso IR; Pereira JC; D'Albuquerque LA; Cecconello I; Jukemura J
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2011; 57(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 21390457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.