These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

699 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11928886)

  • 1. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs.
    Morris SB; DeShon RP
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Mar; 7(1):105-25. PubMed ID: 11928886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs.
    Lajeunessei MJ
    Ecology; 2011 Nov; 92(11):2049-55. PubMed ID: 22164829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using response ratios for meta-analyzing single-case designs with behavioral outcomes.
    Pustejovsky JE
    J Sch Psychol; 2018 Jun; 68():99-112. PubMed ID: 29861034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consequences of sequential sampling for meta-analysis.
    Braschi L; Botella J; Suero M
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1167-83. PubMed ID: 24399083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating intervention effects across different types of single-subject experimental designs: empirical illustration.
    Moeyaert M; Ugille M; Ferron JM; Onghena P; Heyvaert M; Beretvas SN; Van den Noortgate W
    Sch Psychol Q; 2015 Mar; 30(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 24884449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes.
    Van den Noortgate W; López-López JA; Marín-Martínez F; Sánchez-Meca J
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):576-94. PubMed ID: 23055166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The metric comparability of meta-analytic effect-size estimators from factorial designs.
    Gillett R
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 14664680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect size calculation in meta-analyses of psychotherapy outcome research.
    Hoyt WT; Del Re AC
    Psychother Res; 2018 May; 28(3):379-388. PubMed ID: 29179665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: a primer and applications.
    Shadish WR; Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):123-47. PubMed ID: 24606972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis.
    Peterson RA; Brown SP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 15641898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A framework for the meta-analysis of Bland-Altman studies based on a limits of agreement approach.
    Tipton E; Shuster J
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3621-3635. PubMed ID: 28664537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Jun; 19(2):211-29. PubMed ID: 23834422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals.
    Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Shadish WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):324-41. PubMed ID: 26053946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research.
    Berkeljon A; Baldwin SA
    Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):511-8. PubMed ID: 20183404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating Standardized Effect Sizes for Two- and Three-Level Partially Nested Data.
    Lai MH; Kwok OM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):740-756. PubMed ID: 27802077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?
    Field AP
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):444-67. PubMed ID: 16392999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
    Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.