These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

821 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11928888)

  • 1. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.
    MacCallum RC; Zhang S; Preacher KJ; Rucker DD
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Mar; 7(1):19-40. PubMed ID: 11928888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization.
    DeCoster J; Iselin AM; Gallucci M
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Dec; 14(4):349-66. PubMed ID: 19968397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of joint dichotomization and single dichotomization of interacting variables to discriminate a disease outcome.
    Nelson SP; Ramakrishnan V; Nietert P; Kamen D; Ramos P; Wolf B
    Int J Biostat; 2022 Nov; 18(2):613-625. PubMed ID: 35536987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on dichotomization of continuous response variable in the presence of contamination and model misspecification.
    Shentu Y; Xie M
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(21):2200-14. PubMed ID: 20812301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Dichotomization of continuous variables in logistic regression models].
    Cumsille F; Bangdiwala SI
    Rev Med Chil; 1996 Jul; 124(7):836-42. PubMed ID: 9138372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the effects of continuous and discrete covariate mismeasurement, with emphasis on the dichotomization of mismeasured predictors.
    Gustafson P; Le Nhu D
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):878-87. PubMed ID: 12495142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status.
    Prince Nelson SL; Ramakrishnan V; Nietert PJ; Kamen DL; Ramos PS; Wolf BJ
    Commun Stat Theory Methods; 2017; 46(21):10823-10834. PubMed ID: 29962658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Converting from d to r to z when the design uses extreme groups, dichotomization, or experimental control.
    Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Mar; 19(1):92-112. PubMed ID: 24079923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power loss for linkage analysis due to the dichotomization of trichotomous phenotypes.
    Corbett J; Gu CC; Rice JP; Reich T; Province MA; Rao DC
    Hum Hered; 2004; 57(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 15133309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Item Misspecification and Dichotomization on Class and Parameter Recovery in LCA of Count Data.
    Macia KS; Wickham RE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):113-145. PubMed ID: 30595072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fact or artefact: an item response theory analysis of median split based repressor classification.
    Gebhardt C; Rose N; Mitte K
    Br J Health Psychol; 2014 Feb; 19(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 23379417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the cutoff based on a continuous variable to define two populations with application to vaccines.
    Li S; Parnes M; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):662-80. PubMed ID: 23611202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spurious interaction as a result of categorization.
    Thoresen M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 30732587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and d.
    McGrath RE; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):386-401. PubMed ID: 17154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.
    Bauer DJ; Curran PJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 15053717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unbiased split variable selection for random survival forests using maximally selected rank statistics.
    Wright MN; Dankowski T; Ziegler A
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1272-1284. PubMed ID: 28088842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responder analysis without dichotomization.
    Zhang Z; Chu J; Rahardja D; Zhang H; Tang L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(6):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 27540771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual level: a latent variable multilevel model.
    Croon MA; van Veldhoven MJ
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 17402811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender dichotomization at the level of ingroup identity: what it is, and why men use it more than women.
    Bosson JK; Michniewicz KS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Sep; 105(3):425-42. PubMed ID: 23750813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biased odds ratios from dichotomization of age.
    Chen H; Cohen P; Chen S
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3487-97. PubMed ID: 17066378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.