176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11929014)
1. The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography.
Stone MF; Zhao W; Jacak BV; O'Connor P; Yu B; Rehak P
Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 11929014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal performance of amorphous selenium mammography detectors.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 15719963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The x-ray time of flight method for investigation of ghosting in amorphous selenium-based flat panel medical x-ray imagers.
Rau AW; Bakueva L; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3160-77. PubMed ID: 16279070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging.
Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: detectors with high voltage protection.
Zhao W; Law J; Waechter D; Huang Z; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 9571622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of amorphous selenium to x rays from 40 kVp to 18 MV: measurements and implications for portal imaging.
Mah D; Rowlands JA; Rawlinson JA
Med Phys; 1998 Apr; 25(4):444-56. PubMed ID: 9571610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The dependence of the modulation transfer function on the blocking layer thickness in amorphous selenium x-ray detectors.
Hunter DM; Belev G; DeCrescenzo G; Kasap SO; Mainprize JG; Rowlands JA; Smith C; Tümer T; Verpakhovski V; Yin S; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3358-73. PubMed ID: 17879799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: determination of x-ray sensitivity by pulse height spectroscopy.
Rowlands JA; DeCrescenzo G; Araj N
Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1065-9. PubMed ID: 1518469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ghosting caused by bulk charge trapping in direct conversion flat-panel detectors using amorphous selenium.
Zhao W; DeCrescenzo G; Kasap SO; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 15789596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy, angular and spatial distributions of primary electrons inside photoconducting materials for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6439-60. PubMed ID: 17951854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measured and calculated K-fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous-selenium based CCD x-ray detector.
Hunter DM; Belev G; Kasap S; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):608-22. PubMed ID: 22320770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors.
Hajdok G; Yao J; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3601-20. PubMed ID: 17089826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive receptors for digital mammography.
Fahrig R; Rowlands JA; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 7565346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photon counting multienergy x-ray imaging: effect of the characteristic x rays on detector performance.
Shikhaliev PM; Fritz SG; Chapman JW
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5107-19. PubMed ID: 19994521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
