155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11930053)
1. Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helical CT.
Sudah M; Vanninen RL; Partanen K; Kainulainen S; Malinen A; Heino A; Ala-Opas M
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 11930053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR urography in evaluation of acute flank pain: T2-weighted sequences and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional FLASH compared with urography. Fast low-angle shot.
Sudah M; Vanninen R; Partanen K; Heino A; Vainio P; Ala-Opas M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jan; 176(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 11133546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography.
Sourtzis S; Thibeau JF; Damry N; Raslan A; Vandendris M; Bellemans M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1491-4. PubMed ID: 10350278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain.
Dalrymple NC; Verga M; Anderson KR; Bove P; Covey AM; Rosenfield AT; Smith RC
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 9474137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gadolinium-enhanced excretory MR urography after low-dose diuretic injection: comparison with conventional excretory urography.
Nolte-Ernsting CC; Bücker A; Adam GB; Neuerburg JM; Jung P; Hunter DW; Jakse G; Günther RW
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 9769826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unenhanced helical CT scan for the investigation of acute ureteral colic.
Bari V; Usman MU; Murad M; Yaqoob J
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Mar; 13(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 12689546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT.
Smith RC; Verga M; McCarthy S; Rosenfield AT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 8571915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain.
Hamm M; Knopfle E; Wartenberg S; Wawroschek F; Weckermann D; Harzmann R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1687-91. PubMed ID: 11912388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [MR-urography and CT-urography: principles, examination techniques, applications].
Nolte-Ernsting C; Staatz G; Wildberger J; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 12584621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic value of HASTE technique and excretory MR urography in urinary system obstructions].
Erdoğmuş B; Bozkurt M; Bakir Z
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Dec; 10(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 15611922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of MR urography in patients with urinary diversion.
Battal B; Kocaoglu M; Akgun V; Aydur E; Dayanc M; Ilica T
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 22141600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain.
Niall O; Russell J; MacGregor R; Duncan H; Mullins J
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):534-7. PubMed ID: 9915442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unenhanced spiral CT in acute ureteral colic: a replacement for excretory urography?
Ryu JA; Kim B; Jeon YH; Lee J; Lee JW; Jeon SS; Park KH
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11752964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT.
Levine JA; Neitlich J; Verga M; Dalrymple N; Smith RC
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9205218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment.
Fielding JR; Silverman SG; Samuel S; Zou KH; Loughlin KR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Oct; 171(4):1051-3. PubMed ID: 9762995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute ureterolithiasis: nonenhanced helical CT findings of perinephric edema for prediction of degree of ureteral obstruction.
Boridy IC; Kawashima A; Goldman SM; Sandler CM
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):663-7. PubMed ID: 10580936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography.
Soto JA; Alvarez O; Múnera F; Velez SM; Valencia J; Ramírez N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1127-34. PubMed ID: 11000177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Barone RM; Lacey C; Sigeti JS; Alzate GD; Sebrechts CP
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
