These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11930378)

  • 21. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now?
    Chez BF; Baird SM
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 25(2):180-92; quiz 193-4. PubMed ID: 21540697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of five classification systems for interpreting electronic fetal monitoring in predicting neonatal status at birth.
    Di Tommaso M; Seravalli V; Cordisco A; Consorti G; Mecacci F; Rizzello F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Mar; 26(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 23039108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comprehensive perinatal patient safety program to reduce preventable adverse outcomes and costs of liability claims.
    Simpson KR; Kortz CC; Knox GE
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2009 Nov; 35(11):565-74. PubMed ID: 19947333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia.
    Clark SL; Hamilton EF; Garite TJ; Timmins A; Warrick PA; Smith S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):163.e1-163.e6. PubMed ID: 27751795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prevention, recognition, and treatment of perinatal asphyxia.
    Jacobs MM; Phibbs RH
    Clin Perinatol; 1989 Dec; 16(4):785-807. PubMed ID: 2686887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The fetal electrocardiogram.
    van Wijngaarden WJ; James DK; Symonds EM
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jun; 10(2):273-94. PubMed ID: 8836485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ST segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram plus electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labor and its relationship to umbilical cord arterial blood gases.
    Dervaitis KL; Poole M; Schmidt G; Penava D; Natale R; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):879-84. PubMed ID: 15467558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perinatal asphyxia: assessing its causal role and timing.
    Depp R
    Semin Pediatr Neurol; 1995 Mar; 2(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 9422232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selection of babies for intervention after birth asphyxia.
    Groenendaal F; de Vries LS
    Semin Neonatol; 2000 Feb; 5(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 10802747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Problems with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation and patient management.
    Ross MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1355-6. PubMed ID: 12798551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intrapartum fetal heart rate definitions and interpretation: evolving consensus.
    Miller DA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21278497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Failure to rescue as a process measure to evaluate fetal safety during labor.
    Beaulieu MJ
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2009; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19104315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
    Herbst A; Ingemarsson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Continuous electronic fetal heart monitoring versus intermittent auscultation during labor: Would the literature outcomes have the same results if they were interpreted following the NICHHD guidelines?
    Tommaso MD; Pinzauti S; Bandinelli S; Poli C; Ragusa A
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Sep; 28(9):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 31464110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
    Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrapartum fetal monitoring: liability and documentation.
    Miller L
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 21278501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The significance of internal electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate. Report of 144 cases].
    Li K
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1991 Jan; 71(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 1850651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Medicolegal ramifications of electronic fetal monitoring during labor.
    Schifrin BS
    Clin Perinatol; 1995 Dec; 22(4):837-54. PubMed ID: 8665762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis.
    Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Feb; 93(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24251909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.