These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11930717)
21. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys. Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of surface characteristics of titanium and cobalt chromium implant abutment materials. Herbst D; Dullabh H; Sykes L; Vorster C SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):350, 352-6. PubMed ID: 24660402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols. Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Primary bacterial colonization of implant surfaces. Drake DR; Paul J; Keller JC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 10212539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro binding interactions of oral bacteria with immobilized fructosyltransferase. Shemesh M; Steinberg D J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 100(4):871-7. PubMed ID: 16553744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surface changes and bacterial adhesion on implant abutment materials after various clinical cleaning procedures. Huang YS; Hung CY; Huang HH J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Aug; 82(8):643-650. PubMed ID: 31305347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans NCTC 10449 to artificial teeth: an in vitro study. Hahnel S; Rosentritt M; Bürgers R; Handel G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 18922260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to esthetic bracket materials. Faltermeier A; Bürgers R; Rosentritt M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):S99-103. PubMed ID: 18407028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Dental application of superplastic forming for titanium complete denture bases]. Murakami H Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Mar; 27(1):61-81. PubMed ID: 2610309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Titanium release from implants prepared with different surface roughness. Wennerberg A; Ide-Ektessabi A; Hatkamata S; Sawase T; Johansson C; Albrektsson T; Martinelli A; Södervall U; Odelius H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15355391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Focal adhesion contact formation by fibroblasts cultured on surface-modified dental implants: an in vitro study. Grössner-Schreiber B; Herzog M; Hedderich J; Dück A; Hannig M; Griepentrog M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 17092235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium. Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments. Sadig WM; Al Harbi MW Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reduced medical infection related bacterial strains adhesion on bioactive RGD modified titanium surfaces: a first step toward cell selective surfaces. Maddikeri RR; Tosatti S; Schuler M; Chessari S; Textor M; Richards RG; Harris LG J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Feb; 84(2):425-35. PubMed ID: 17618480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Streptococcal adhesion to various luting systems and the role of mixing errors. Buergers R; Hahnel S; Reischl U; Mueller R; Rosentritt M; Handel G; Behr M Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 19235565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns. Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 16827738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differential adhesion of Streptococcus gordonii to anatase and rutile titanium dioxide surfaces with and without functionalization with chlorhexidine. Barbour ME; Gandhi N; el-Turki A; O'Sullivan DJ; Jagger DC J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(4):993-8. PubMed ID: 18655136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap. Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]