121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11930813)
1. Proper operation, maintenance, and servicing of aerobic wastewater treatment systems.
Guy B; Catanzaro M
J Environ Health; 2002 Apr; 64(8):23-4. PubMed ID: 11930813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survey of the home sewage disposal systems in northeast Ohio.
Tumeo MA; Newland J
J Environ Health; 2009 Sep; 72(2):17-22. PubMed ID: 19761004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recirculating gravel filters: high-performance treatment at low cost for two small communities.
Newton C; Wilson JP
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1245-51. PubMed ID: 18845863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of membrane solid-liquid separation on design of biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
Ramphao M; Wentzel MC; Merritt R; Ekama GA; Young T; Buckley CA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(6):630-46. PubMed ID: 15696540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recycling of treated domestic effluent from an on-site wastewater treatment system for hydroponics.
Oyama N; Nair J; Ho GE
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):211-9. PubMed ID: 16104424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Zero Nuisance Piggeries: long-term performance of MBR (membrane bioreactor) for dilute swine wastewater treatment using submerged membrane bioreactor in semi-industrial scale.
Prado N; Ochoa J; Amrane A
Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1549-58. PubMed ID: 19136138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scalable mobile information system to support the treatment process and the workflow of wastewater facilities.
Schuchardt L; Steinmetz H; Ehret J; Ebert A; Schmitt TG
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):199-206. PubMed ID: 15685996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterisation and optimisation of individual wastewater treatment systems.
Moelants N; Janssen G; Smets I; Van Impe J
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):2059-64. PubMed ID: 18587198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. North American performance experience with anoxic and anaerobic selectors for activated sludge bulking control.
Parker D; Appleton R; Bratby J; Melcer H
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):221-8. PubMed ID: 15553479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changing needs for appropriate excreta disposal and small wastewater treatment methodologies or The future technology of small wastewater treatment systems.
Randall CW
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):1-6. PubMed ID: 14753512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effluent quality from 200 on-site sewage systems: design values for guidelines.
Charles KJ; Ashbolt NJ; Roser DJ; McGuinness R; Deere DA
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):163-9. PubMed ID: 16104418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pilot scale study of a sequencing batch reactor treating municipal wastewater operated via the UP-PND process.
Kornaros M; Marazioti C; Lyberatos G
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18701797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operating space diagrams: a tool for designers of wastewater treatment plants.
Hopkins LN; Lant PA; Newell RB
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):69-76. PubMed ID: 11548023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Joint operation of small wastewater treatment plants in southern Turkey.
Sarikaya HZ; Sevimli MF; Koyuncu I; Yuksel E
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):69-76. PubMed ID: 14753520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined quantity management and biological treatment of sludge liquor at Hamburg's wastewater treatment plants--first experience in operation with the Store and Treat process.
Laurich F
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):49-52. PubMed ID: 15553458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the effluent of small wastewater treatment plants by bacteria reduction and nutrient removal with an algal biofilm.
Schumacher G; Sekoulov I
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 14510233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operation of three parallel AN/AO processes to enrich denitrifying phosphorus removing bacteria for low strength wastewater treatment.
Xia SQ; Liu HB
J Environ Sci (China); 2006; 18(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 17294636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing the total discharge from a large WWTP by separate treatment of primary effluent overflow.
Hanner N; Mattsson A; Gruvberger C; Nyberg U; Aspegren H; Fredriksson O; Nordqvist A; Andersson B
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):157-62. PubMed ID: 15553471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficiency of biological aerobic treatment of piggery wastewater to control nitrogen, phosphorus, pathogen and gas emissions.
Béline F; Daumer ML; Loyon L; Pourcher AM; Dabert P; Guiziou F; Peu P
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1909-14. PubMed ID: 18587177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
