These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11930836)

  • 1. [Human tooth tissue as dental restorative material].
    Moscovich H; Creugers NH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Jan; 106(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 11930836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The novel use of extracted teeth as a dental restorative material--the 'Natural Inlay'.
    Moscovich H; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 1998 Jan; 26(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9479921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using copy milling technology in restorative dentistry.
    McLaren EA
    Dent Today; 1997 Mar; 16(3):80, 82, 84-5. PubMed ID: 9560645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microscope observations of ART excavated cavities and restorations.
    Grossman ES; Mickenautsch S
    SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):359-63. PubMed ID: 12494712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays.
    Moscovich H; Creugers NH; De Kanter RJ; Roeters FJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9855856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal integrity in ceramic inlays.
    Gemalmaz D; Sertgöz A; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1996 Sep; 2(2-3):465-9. PubMed ID: 9569799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.
    Boushell LW; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.