These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11931002)

  • 41. Children's use of a verbal-nonverbal consistency principle to infer truth and lying.
    Rotenberg KJ; Simourd L; Moore D
    Child Dev; 1989 Apr; 60(2):309-22. PubMed ID: 2924654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
    Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid.
    Leal S; Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 20398882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.
    Santarcangelo M; Cribbie RA; Hubbard AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15209321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Credibility judgements of detectives: the impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills, and physical characteristics on impression formation.
    Vrij A
    J Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 133(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 8283858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is interactional dissynchrony a clue to deception? Insights from automated analysis of nonverbal visual cues.
    Yu X; Zhang S; Yan Z; Yang F; Huang J; Dunbar NE; Jensen ML; Burgoon JK; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2015 Mar; 45(3):506-20. PubMed ID: 24988600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perceived deception in negotiation: Consequences and the mediating role of trust.
    Au AKC; Wong NCQ
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(4):459-473. PubMed ID: 30683017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Judging veracity impairs eyewitnesses' memory of a perpetrator.
    Pickel KL; Kulig TC; Bauer HM
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):843-56. PubMed ID: 23350799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The use-the-best heuristic facilitates deception detection.
    Verschuere B; Lin CC; Huismann S; Kleinberg B; Willemse M; Mei ECJ; van Goor T; Löwy LHS; Appiah OK; Meijer E
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 May; 7(5):718-728. PubMed ID: 36941469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.
    Logue M; Book AS; Frosina P; Huizinga T; Amos S
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 25844516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bad drives psychological reactions, but good propels behavior: responses to honesty and deception.
    Wang CS; Galinsky AD; Murnighan JK
    Psychol Sci; 2009 May; 20(5):634-44. PubMed ID: 19476593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Inside interrogation: the lie, the bluff, and false confessions.
    Perillo JT; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 20734122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How researchers can make verbal lie detection more attractive for practitioners.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP; Leal S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2023; 30(3):383-396. PubMed ID: 37346059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.