These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

573 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11931137)

  • 1. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Voit S; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12540119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postadjustment polishing of CAD-CAM ceramic with luminescence diamond gel.
    Finger WJ; Noack MD
    Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polishing occlusal surfaces of direct Class II composite restorations in vivo.
    Jung M; Hornung K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15853097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
    Flury S; Lussi A; Zimmerli B
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 20672733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer.
    Tholt de Vasconcellos B; Miranda-Júnior WG; Prioli R; Thompson J; Oda M
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16924984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques.
    Turssi CP; Saad JR; Duarte SL; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Jun; 13(3):136-8. PubMed ID: 11763949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.