These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11931941)

  • 1. Line bisection in normal adults: direction of attentional bias for near and far space.
    Varnava A; McCarthy M; Beaumont JG
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1372-8. PubMed ID: 11931941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space.
    Garza JP; Eslinger PJ; Barrett AM
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 18381226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Far bias on the radial line bisection task: measuring perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in normal subjects.
    Barrett AM; Crosson JB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Cortex; 2002 Dec; 38(5):769-78. PubMed ID: 12507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation.
    Keller I; Schindler I; Kerkhoff G; von Rosen F; Golz D
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):724-31. PubMed ID: 15721185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.
    Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developmental changes in line bisection: a result of callosal maturation?
    Hausmann M; Waldie KE; Corballis MC
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Jan; 17(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 12597084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of acute ethanol challenge on global visuospatial attention: exaggeration of leftward bias in line bisection.
    Leone L; McCourt ME
    Laterality; 2010 May; 15(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 19319748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagonal spatial neglect.
    Mark VW; Heilman KM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Sep; 65(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 9728947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Line bisection performance of normal adults: two subgroups with opposite biases.
    Braun JG; Kirk A
    Neurology; 1999 Aug; 53(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 10449115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Horizontal space misrepresentation in unilateral brain damage. I. Visual and proprioceptive-motor influences in left unilateral neglect.
    Doricchi F; Galati G; DeLuca L; Nico D; D'Olimpio F
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1107-17. PubMed ID: 11931915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect.
    Manning L; Halligan PW; Marshall JC
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(7):647-55. PubMed ID: 2215876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Near and far space neglect: task sensitivity and anatomical substrates.
    Aimola L; Schindler I; Simone AM; Venneri A
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22306826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Space representation in children with dyslexia and children without dyslexia: contribution of line bisection and circle centering tasks.
    Vieira S; Quercia P; Bonnetblanc F; Michel C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3997-4008. PubMed ID: 24036389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right.
    Urbanski M; Bartolomeo P
    Cortex; 2008; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.
    Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.