125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11932218)
1. Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique.
Brennan PC; Johnston D
Br J Radiol; 2002 Mar; 75(891):243-8. PubMed ID: 11932218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals.
Johnston DA; Brennan PC
Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):396-402. PubMed ID: 10844865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Check of compliance with quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in quality control].
Ropolo R; Isoardi P; Catuzzo P; Bianchi SD; Bradac GB; Cammarota T; Davini O; De Lucchi R; Gandini G
Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 11360757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of exposure parameters in plain radiography: a comparative study with European guidelines.
Lança L; Silva A; Alves E; Serranheira F; Correia M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18430717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. European guidelines on radiographic image quality in chiropractic practice - proposal of a cross-sectional graded classification reporting principle.
Doktor K; Vilholm ML; Hardardóttir A; Christensen HW; Lauritsen J
Chiropr Man Therap; 2021 May; 29(1):19. PubMed ID: 34039379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient dose, image quality and radiographic techniques for common X ray examinations in two Greek hospitals and comparison with European guidelines.
Papadimitriou D; Perris A; Molfetas MG; Panagiotakis N; Manetou A; Tsourouflis G; Vassileva J; Chronopoulos P; Karapanagiotou O; Kottou S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11468804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Report of an image quality and dose audit according to directive 97/43/Euratom at Spanish private radiodiagnostics facilities.
González L; Vañó E; Oliete S; Manrique J; Hernáez JM; Lahuerta J; Ruiz J
Br J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 72(854):186-92. PubMed ID: 10365071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Level of compliance with the radiation protection regulation--a survey among Norwegian hospitals and X-ray institutes.
Friberg EG; Widmark A; Solberg M; Wøhni T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):223-6. PubMed ID: 21743081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
Bogucarskis K; Salmins A; Gfirtner H; Anatschkowa E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experiences with the European guidelines on quality criteria for radiographic images in Tanzania.
Muhogora WE; Nyanda AM; Kazema RR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 11686743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels in paediatric screen-film radiography at a children's hospital.
Wambani JS; Korir GK; Korir IK; Kilaha S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 May; 154(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 23091220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images of the lumbar spine - an intra- and inter-observer reproducibility study.
Doktor K; Vilholm ML; Hardardóttir A; Christensen HW; Lauritsen J
Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():20. PubMed ID: 31069046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.
Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG
Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.
Roohi Shalemaei R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):220-2. PubMed ID: 21764806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic quality and radiation protection in general medical practice and small hospitals.
Williamson BD; Le Heron JC
N Z Med J; 1989 Mar; 102(863):104-7. PubMed ID: 2494612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation in repeat rates between 18 radiology departments.
Rogers KD; Matthews IP; Roberts CJ
Br J Radiol; 1987 May; 60(713):463-8. PubMed ID: 3580757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?
Doherty P; O'Leary D; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):1992-9. PubMed ID: 12942300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Viewing conditions for diagnostic images in three major Dublin hospitals: a comparison with WHO and CEC recommendations.
McCarthy E; Brennan PC
Br J Radiol; 2003 Feb; 76(902):94-7. PubMed ID: 12642276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
