These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11932218)

  • 21. Exposure variations under error conditions in automatic exposure controlled film-screen projection radiography.
    Walsh C; Larkin A; Dennan S; O'Reilly G
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Nov; 77(923):931-3. PubMed ID: 15507417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A reduction in radiographic exposure and image quality in film screen postero-anterior chest radiography.
    Egbe NO; Egong EA; Ekpo EU; Inah GB
    Niger J Med; 2012; 21(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23301442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of skin entrance doses (SEDs) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in India and proposed diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).
    Sonawane AU; Shirva VK; Pradhan AS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Feb; 138(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19864328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Average radiation exposure values for three diagnostic radiographic examinations.
    Rueter FG; Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 2217766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine.
    Offiah AC; Hall CM
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Dec; 76(912):885-90. PubMed ID: 14711776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Local diagnostic reference levels for adult posteroanterior (PA) chest x-ray examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    Teferi S; Admassie D; Worku A; Zewdeneh D
    Ethiop Med J; 2010 Jan; 48(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20607998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A quality assurance program in dental radiographic units in western Greece.
    Stavrianou K; Pappous G; Pallikarakis N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 May; 99(5):622-7. PubMed ID: 15829888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial.
    Vañó E; Oliete S; González L; Guibelalde E; Velasco A; Fernández JM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Dec; 68(816):1332-35. PubMed ID: 8777594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Management of patient doses and diagnostic reference levels in X-ray radiography in Lithuania.
    Ziliukas J; Krynke L; Urboniene A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):313-6. PubMed ID: 20211916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Nordic survey of patient doses in diagnostic radiology.
    Grøn P; Olerud HM; Einarsson G; Leitz W; Servomaa A; Schoultz BW; Hjardemaal O
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(12):1988-92. PubMed ID: 11305583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiation doses to cohabitants of patients undergoing radioiodine ablation for thyroid cancer: poor compliance with radiation protection guidelines but low radiation exposure.
    Gabriel S; Farman-Ara B; Bourrelly M; Carpentier O; Sebag F; Palazzo FF; De Micco C; Mancini J; Henry JF; Mundler O; Taïeb D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Sep; 32(9):829-33. PubMed ID: 21633315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimisation of patient radiation protection in conventional X-ray imaging procedures using film reject analysis: a demonstration of the importance of rare earth screen-film systems.
    Inkoom S; Schandorf C; Fletcher JJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19737839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Experiences with processing control in the radiology department of a large municipal hospital].
    von Volkmann T; Piasecki M; Kugler B; Hammacher A; Klotz E
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Dec; 39(12):362-6. PubMed ID: 3809923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compliance of reviewing portal images on radiographic film vs an electronic medical record.
    Chen GG; Hammoud A; Komajda M; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):495-7. PubMed ID: 22748791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.
    Almén A; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Besjakov J; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 73(875):1192-9. PubMed ID: 11144797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Safety technics in working in the x-ray office].
    Chikirdin EG
    Med Sestra; 1988 Oct; 47(10):42-5. PubMed ID: 3231060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for x-ray examinations.
    Brennan PC; McDonnell S; O'Leary D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 15031448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An investigation on patient dose in screen-film diagnostic radiology in Lhasa City, Xizang Autonomous Region, China.
    Du X
    Front Med; 2013 Dec; 7(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 24142378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.