115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933263)
1. Back to the negative Pap test: behind the scenes at Bethesda 2001.
Young NA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Apr; 26(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 11933263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Is Bethesda system better than Pap classification?].
Vuopala S
Duodecim; 1999; 115(18):2030-4. PubMed ID: 11941821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Pap, Bethesda or something else?].
Syrjänen K
Duodecim; 2000; 116(11):1248-50. PubMed ID: 11989011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abnormal cervical cytology: new names, familiar smears.
Carulli DT
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2003 Oct; 15(10):444-9. PubMed ID: 14606133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bethesda system for cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses.
Herbst AL
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Mar; 35(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1544245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The 1988 Bethesda system for cervical vaginal cytology: pros and cons.
Barlow JF
S D J Med; 1991 Jun; 44(6):157-8. PubMed ID: 1658929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Bethesda system for the reporting of cervical/vaginal cytology.
Oren A; Fernandes J
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 May; 91(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 2061103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Bethesda terminology and evidence-based management guidelines for cervical cytology findings.
Stoler MH
JAMA; 2002 Apr; 287(16):2140-1. PubMed ID: 11966390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for cervical cancer. Current terminology, classification, and technique.
Fowler J
Postgrad Med; 1993 Feb; 93(2):57-64, 70. PubMed ID: 8381956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reflections on adequacy in cervical/vaginal cytology.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):103-4. PubMed ID: 10385439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Moving forward on 'ASCUS,' but not there yet.
Naryshkin S
CAP Today; 1996 Mar; 10(3):32, 34, 36. PubMed ID: 10184599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [How to read a PAP report?].
Nieminen P
Duodecim; 1998; 114(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11544696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytology reports: are the "Pap" classes outdated?
Marcus PB; Justice KL
Tex Med; 1984 Dec; 80(12):38-40. PubMed ID: 6515577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. National Cancer Institute Workshop.
JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(7):931-4. PubMed ID: 2754794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bethesda 2001.
Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 11985563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pap smear grading system overhaul aims to eliminate confusion.
Rollins G
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2001 Oct; 12(20):10, 12. PubMed ID: 12378758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pap smears and screening for cervical neoplasia.
Wilkinson EJ
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 33(4):817-25. PubMed ID: 2289348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Bethesda System 2001: update on terminology and application.
Crothers BA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 48(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15725862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Bethesda system and Pap smear screening.
Miller K
Am Fam Physician; 1995 Feb; 51(2):331-2. PubMed ID: 7840027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [New classification in cervical cytology: the Bethesda system].
Bodó M; Tóth V
Orv Hetil; 1991 May; 132(19):1039-40. PubMed ID: 2027678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
