115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933263)
21. Those gland problems in cervical cytology: faith or fact? Observations from the Bethesda 2001 terminology conference.
Moriarty AT; Wilbur D
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 12672090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The revised Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda workshop.
J Reprod Med; 1992 May; 37(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 1354748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical and vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda workshop.
J Fam Pract; 1992 Jul; 35(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 1613480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
Sedlis A
Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Maryland--Greece--Finland?].
Mäkinen J
Duodecim; 1999; 115(22):2506-7. PubMed ID: 11973975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. ASCUS; borderline changes; epithelial abnormality; Pap class III -- what's in a name?
Deery A
Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):231-4. PubMed ID: 14510885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [New nomenclature in gynecologic cytology].
Breitenecker G; Dinges HP; Gitsch G
Gynakol Rundsch; 1990; 30 Suppl 1():162-4. PubMed ID: 2079254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Continued lack of appreciation for the significance of the Bethesda system--Proceedings from cytology courses organized in Wrocław].
Pawelec M
Ginekol Pol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 11455937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Managing abnormal Pap smears: comments on two articles.
Buck HW
J Am Coll Health; 1989 Sep; 38(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 2778225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Pap smear update--the Bethesda (nomenclature) System.
Piper DM
West J Med; 1991 Mar; 154(3):325. PubMed ID: 2028595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical cytology.
Beal MW
NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1990; 1(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 2081083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Bethesda system for classification of Pap smears: the clinical experience of one cancer screening center.
Mahon SM
Cancer Nurs; 1995 Dec; 18(6):458-66. PubMed ID: 8564942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. New Pap test terminology, management guidelines published.
Twombly R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(12):878-80. PubMed ID: 12072539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.
Solomon D; Davey D; Kurman R; Moriarty A; O'Connor D; Prey M; Raab S; Sherman M; Wilbur D; Wright T; Young N; ;
JAMA; 2002 Apr; 287(16):2114-9. PubMed ID: 11966386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Is the end of the Pap classification in sight?].
Lammes FB; van den Tweel JG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Jan; 134(2):51-3. PubMed ID: 2296323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Borderline smears: have the guidelines lessened the confusion or increased it?
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 8833879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pap smears: interpreting the new Bethesda terminology.
Gore H; Shingleton HM
J Surg Oncol; 1997 Feb; 64(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 9047243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Management of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Appleby J
Med Clin North Am; 1995 Mar; 79(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 7877395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bethesda 2014: improving on a paradigm shift.
Wilbur DC; Nayar R
Cytopathology; 2015 Dec; 26(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 26767599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervical cytology.
Hudson E
BMJ; 1990 May; 300(6736):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2196945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
