These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933287)

  • 1. A simple severity index for pressure ulcers.
    Emparanza JI; Aranegui P; Ruiz MM; Perez E
    J Wound Care; 2000 Feb; 9(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 11933287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DESIGN-R, an assessment instrument for pressure ulcers .
    Zhong X; Nagase T; Huang L; Kaitani T; Iizaka S; Yamamoto Y; Kanazawa T; Sanada H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):36-43. PubMed ID: 23388396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers.
    Günes UY
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 May; 55(5):48-52. PubMed ID: 19471048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive validity of weekly monitoring of wound status using DESIGN-R score change for pressure ulcer healing: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Iizaka S; Sanada H; Matsui Y; Furue M; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y;
    Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 22747950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing.
    Sanada H; Moriguchi T; Miyachi Y; Ohura T; Nakajo T; Tokunaga K; Fukui M; Sugama J; Kitagawa A
    J Wound Care; 2004 Jan; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 14969021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective cohort study of prognostic factors for the healing of heel pressure ulcers.
    McGinnis E; Greenwood DC; Nelson EA; Nixon J
    Age Ageing; 2014 Mar; 43(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 24366839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the Braden Q Scale to Predict Pressure Ulcer Risk in pediatric patients.
    Noonan C; Quigley S; Curley MA
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2011 Dec; 26(6):566-75. PubMed ID: 22055377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting delayed pressure ulcer healing using thermography: a prospective cohort study.
    Nakagami G; Sanada H; Iizaka S; Kadono T; Higashino T; Koyanagi H; Haga N
    J Wound Care; 2010 Nov; 19(11):465-6, 468, 470 passim. PubMed ID: 21135794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical wound assessment using DESIGN-R total score can predict pressure ulcer healing: pooled analysis from two multicenter cohort studies.
    Sanada H; Iizaka S; Matsui Y; Furue M; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y;
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 22092794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
    Suriadi ; Sanada H; Sugama J; Thigpen B; Subuh M
    Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18226053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure ulcer grading.
    Moore Z
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Sep 7-13; 19(52):56-64; quiz 66. PubMed ID: 16163987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study.
    Beeckman D; Schoonhoven L; Fletcher J; Furtado K; Gunningberg L; Heyman H; Lindholm C; Paquay L; Verdú J; Defloor T
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(6):682-91. PubMed ID: 18039255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk.
    Cremasco MF; Wenzel F; Zanei SS; Whitaker IY
    J Clin Nurs; 2013 Aug; 22(15-16):2183-91. PubMed ID: 23216694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.
    Thompson D
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
    Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients.
    Malbrain M; Hendriks B; Wijnands P; Denie D; Jans A; Vanpellicom J; De Keulenaer B
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 20079647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in three university teaching hospitals in Ireland.
    Gallagher P; Barry P; Hartigan I; McCluskey P; O'Connor K; O'Connor M
    J Tissue Viability; 2008 Nov; 17(4):103-9. PubMed ID: 18378140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.