BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933363)

  • 1. A comparison of three primary non-adherent dressings applied to hand surgery wounds.
    Terrill PJ; Varughese G
    J Wound Care; 2000 Sep; 9(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 11933363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of Mepitel silicone net dressings in the management of fingertip injuries in children.
    O'Donovan DA; Mehdi SY; Eadie PA
    J Hand Surg Br; 1999 Dec; 24(6):727-30. PubMed ID: 10672813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydrocolloid dressing in pediatric burns may decrease operative intervention rates.
    Martin FT; O'Sullivan JB; Regan PJ; McCann J; Kelly JL
    J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Mar; 45(3):600-5. PubMed ID: 20223327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of lipidocolloid and chlorhexidine-impregnated tulle gras dressings following microscopically controlled surgery.
    Hessam S; Georgas D; Sand M; Kassa T; Bruns N; Bechara FG
    J Wound Care; 2015 Mar; 24(3):135; 138-9. PubMed ID: 25764958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impregnated acetate gauze compared with lipido-colloid contact layer at dressing removal pain: a single-blind cross-over randomised control trial.
    Meaume S; Thomas P; Truchetet F; Celerier P; Becherel PA; Teot L; Bedane C
    J Wound Care; 2019 Feb; 28(2):89-101. PubMed ID: 30767647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outpatient burns: a prospective study.
    Hunter GR; Chang FC
    J Trauma; 1976 Mar; 16(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 768512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds.
    Chen J; Han CM; Su GL; Tang ZJ; Su SJ; Lin XW
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone-coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds.
    David F; Wurtz JL; Breton N; Bisch O; Gazeu P; Kerihuel JC; Guibon O
    Int Wound J; 2018 Feb; 15(1):159-169. PubMed ID: 29205809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
    Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised controlled pilot study comparing Mepitel(®) and SurfaSoft(®) on paediatric donor sites treated with Recell(®).
    Campanella SD; Rapley P; Ramelet AS
    Burns; 2011 Dec; 37(8):1334-42. PubMed ID: 21982622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a silicone-coated polyamide net dressing and calcium alginate on the healing of split skin graft donor sites: a prospective randomised trial.
    O'Donoghue JM; O'Sullivan ST; O'Shaughnessy M; O'Connor TP
    Acta Chir Plast; 2000; 42(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 10815307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective randomized trial comparing subatmospheric wound therapy with a sealed gauze dressing and the standard vacuum-assisted closure device.
    Dorafshar AH; Franczyk M; Gottlieb LJ; Wroblewski KE; Lohman RF
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jul; 69(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 21712704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a new, flexible lipidocolloid dressing on acute and chronic wounds: results of a clinical study.
    Meaume S; Perez J; Descamps H; Voinchet V; Jault P; Saunier V; Bohbot S
    J Wound Care; 2011 Apr; 20(4):180, 182-5. PubMed ID: 21537306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of silicone net dressing and paraffin gauze dressing in skin-grafted sites.
    Platt AJ; Phipps A; Judkins K
    Burns; 1996 Nov; 22(7):543-5. PubMed ID: 8909755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
    Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
    G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of donor sites--calcium alginate versus paraffin gauze.
    Basse P; Siim E; Lohmann M
    Acta Chir Plast; 1992; 34(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 1279922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fibre-free alginate dressing in the treatment of split thickness skin graft donor sites.
    Steenfos HH; Agren MS
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 1998 Nov; 11(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 9883438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations.
    Holm C; Petersen JS; Grønboek F; Gottrup F
    Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9562277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery.
    McIntosh CD; Thomson CE
    J Wound Care; 2006 Mar; 15(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 16550669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.