539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933579)
1. Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential.
Pierre RV
Clin Lab Med; 2002 Mar; 22(1):279-97. PubMed ID: 11933579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95,141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions.
Novis DA; Walsh M; Wilkinson D; St Louis M; Ben-Ezra J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 May; 130(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 16683868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Canine differential leukocyte counting with the CellaVision DM96Vision, Sysmex XT-2000iV, and Advia 2120 hematology analyzers and a manual method.
Tvedten HW; Lilliehöök IE
Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 40(3):324-39. PubMed ID: 21884185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician Education: Myelodysplastic Syndrome.
Yoshida Y
Oncologist; 1996; 1(4):284-287. PubMed ID: 10388004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XN-1000 hematology analyzer in assessment of the white blood cell count differential in pediatric specimens.
Becker PH; Fenneteau O; Da Costa L
Int J Lab Hematol; 2016 Feb; 38(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 26407903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Japanese Society for Laboratory Hematology flow cytometric reference method of determining the differential leukocyte count: external quality assurance using fresh blood samples.
Kawai Y; Nagai Y; Ogawa E; Kondo H
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Apr; 39(2):202-222. PubMed ID: 28013527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality control in a manual and an automated leukocyte differential count.
Takubo T; Tatsumi N
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():66-74. PubMed ID: 10926263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated digital cell morphology identification system (CellaVision DM96) is very useful for leukocyte differentials in specimens with qualitative or quantitative abnormalities.
Park SH; Park CJ; Choi MO; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Jang S; Chi HS
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Oct; 35(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 23286314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
Barnes PW; McFadden SL; Machin SJ; Simson E;
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16024331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytic performance of the PENTRA 80 automated blood cell analyzer for the evaluation of normal and pathologic WBCs.
Arroyo ME; Tabernero MD; García-Marcos MA; Orfao A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 15842044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Left Shift 1+ flag for the detection of band neutrophils: interlaboratory variations and recommendations for the routine laboratory.
Weerkamp F; Taal PH; De Boer BA;
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Dec; 33(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 21679309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated differentials in the hematology laboratory.
Krause JR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Apr; 93(4 Suppl 1):S11-6. PubMed ID: 2180276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters.
Petrone J; Jackups R; Eby CS; Shimer G; Anderson J; Frater JL
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31162809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Current status and proposal of a guideline for manual slide review of automated complete blood cell count and white blood cell differential].
Woo HY; Shin SY; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim HJ; Lee YK; Chae SL; Chang YH; Choi JR; Han K; Cho SR; Kwon KC
Korean J Lab Med; 2010 Dec; 30(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 21157139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Different Small Clinical Hematology Laboratory Configurations With Focus on Remote Smear Imaging.
Stephens L; Bevins NJ; Bengtsson HI; Broome HE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Oct; 143(10):1234-1245. PubMed ID: 30969157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical application of automated digital image analysis for morphology review of peripheral blood leukocyte].
Xing Y; Yan X; Pu C; Shang K; Dong N; Wang R; Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 96(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 26932858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Mindray BC-5000 hematology analyzer: a new miniature 5-part WBC differential instrument.
Xiang D; Yue J; Lan Y; Sha C; Ren S; Li Y; Li M; Wang C
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Oct; 37(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 25944368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reference intervals and its verification for leukocyte differential count in peripheral blood by CytoDiff flow cytometry].
Qu C; Pu C; Shang K; Dong N; Xing Y; Li X; Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 95(26):2079-83. PubMed ID: 26710870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elimination of instrument-driven reflex manual differential leukocyte counts. Optimization of manual blood smear review criteria in a high-volume automated hematology laboratory.
Lantis KL; Harris RJ; Davis G; Renner N; Finn WG
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 May; 119(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 12760283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
