537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933579)
21. Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100.
de Jonge R; Brouwer R; van Rijn M; van Acker BA; Otten HJ; Lindemans J
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(11):1367-71. PubMed ID: 17087651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Purpose and criteria for blood smear scan, blood smear examination, and blood smear review.
Gulati G; Song J; Florea AD; Gong J
Ann Lab Med; 2013 Jan; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23301216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of abnormal cells in white cell differentials: comparison of the HEMATRAK automated system with manual methods.
Rock WA; Miale JB; Johnson WD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Feb; 81(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 6695859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Absolute neutrophil counts from automated hematology instruments are accurate and precise even at very low levels.
Amundsen EK; Urdal P; Hagve TA; Holthe MR; Henriksson CE
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 137(6):862-9. PubMed ID: 22586044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance evaluation of the immature granulocyte parameter on the Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer.
Field D; Taube E; Heumann S
Lab Hematol; 2006; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 16513542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.
Griswold DJ; Champagne VD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Jul; 84(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 4014075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Leukoflow: multiparameter extended white blood cell differentiation for routine analysis by flow cytometry.
van de Geijn GJ; van Rees V; van Pul-Bom N; Birnie E; Janssen H; Pegels H; Beunis M; Njo T
Cytometry A; 2011 Sep; 79(9):694-706. PubMed ID: 21786418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Further evolution and leukocyte differential using an automated blood cell counter].
Takubo T; Tatsumi N
Rinsho Byori; 1995 Sep; 43(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 7474456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Advances in leukocyte differential and peripheral blood stem cell enumeration.
Atwater S; Corash L
Curr Opin Hematol; 1996 Jan; 3(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 9372054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance evaluation of a hematology blood counter with five-part leukocyte differential capability.
Davis BH; Bigelow NC
Am Clin Lab; 1999; 18(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 10848432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of an automated hematology analyzer and flow cytometry to assess bone marrow cellularity and differential cell count.
Kim M; Kim J; Lim J; Kim Y; Han K; Kang CS
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2004; 34(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 15487705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of white blood cell differential percentages determined by the in-house LaserCyte hematology analyzer and a manual method.
Papasouliotis K; Cue S; Crawford E; Pinches M; Dumont M; Burley K
Vet Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 35(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 16967412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automated hematology: where we stand.
Rappaport ES; Helbert B; Beissner RS; Trowbridge A
South Med J; 1988 Mar; 81(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 3279533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance of automated slidemakers and stainers in a working laboratory environment - routine operation and quality control.
Simson E; Gascon-Lema MG; Brown DL
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e64-76. PubMed ID: 19220552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer in the differential cytologic analysis of biological fluids (cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others).
Aulesa C; Mainar I; Prieto M; Cobos N; Galimany R
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 14649464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer ADVIA® 120 for cerebrospinal fluid analysis and usage of unique hemolysis reagent.
Tanada H; Ikemoto T; Masutani R; Tanaka H; Takubo T
Int J Lab Hematol; 2014 Feb; 36(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 23937551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated differential white cell counts: a critical appraisal.
Bentley SA
Baillieres Clin Haematol; 1990 Oct; 3(4):851-69. PubMed ID: 2271793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feline Differential Leukocyte Count with ProCyte Dx: Frequency and Severity of a Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Error and How to Avoid It.
Tvedten HW; Andersson V; Lilliehöök IE
J Vet Intern Med; 2017 Nov; 31(6):1708-1716. PubMed ID: 28862354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
