BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933579)

  • 21. Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100.
    de Jonge R; Brouwer R; van Rijn M; van Acker BA; Otten HJ; Lindemans J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(11):1367-71. PubMed ID: 17087651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
    Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
    Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Purpose and criteria for blood smear scan, blood smear examination, and blood smear review.
    Gulati G; Song J; Florea AD; Gong J
    Ann Lab Med; 2013 Jan; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23301216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
    Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of abnormal cells in white cell differentials: comparison of the HEMATRAK automated system with manual methods.
    Rock WA; Miale JB; Johnson WD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Feb; 81(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 6695859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absolute neutrophil counts from automated hematology instruments are accurate and precise even at very low levels.
    Amundsen EK; Urdal P; Hagve TA; Holthe MR; Henriksson CE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 137(6):862-9. PubMed ID: 22586044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance evaluation of the immature granulocyte parameter on the Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer.
    Field D; Taube E; Heumann S
    Lab Hematol; 2006; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 16513542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.
    Griswold DJ; Champagne VD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Jul; 84(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 4014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Leukoflow: multiparameter extended white blood cell differentiation for routine analysis by flow cytometry.
    van de Geijn GJ; van Rees V; van Pul-Bom N; Birnie E; Janssen H; Pegels H; Beunis M; Njo T
    Cytometry A; 2011 Sep; 79(9):694-706. PubMed ID: 21786418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Further evolution and leukocyte differential using an automated blood cell counter].
    Takubo T; Tatsumi N
    Rinsho Byori; 1995 Sep; 43(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 7474456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advances in leukocyte differential and peripheral blood stem cell enumeration.
    Atwater S; Corash L
    Curr Opin Hematol; 1996 Jan; 3(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 9372054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance evaluation of a hematology blood counter with five-part leukocyte differential capability.
    Davis BH; Bigelow NC
    Am Clin Lab; 1999; 18(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 10848432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of an automated hematology analyzer and flow cytometry to assess bone marrow cellularity and differential cell count.
    Kim M; Kim J; Lim J; Kim Y; Han K; Kang CS
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2004; 34(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 15487705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of white blood cell differential percentages determined by the in-house LaserCyte hematology analyzer and a manual method.
    Papasouliotis K; Cue S; Crawford E; Pinches M; Dumont M; Burley K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 35(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 16967412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated hematology: where we stand.
    Rappaport ES; Helbert B; Beissner RS; Trowbridge A
    South Med J; 1988 Mar; 81(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 3279533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance of automated slidemakers and stainers in a working laboratory environment - routine operation and quality control.
    Simson E; Gascon-Lema MG; Brown DL
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e64-76. PubMed ID: 19220552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of the Advia 120 hematology analyzer in the differential cytologic analysis of biological fluids (cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, synovial, and others).
    Aulesa C; Mainar I; Prieto M; Cobos N; Galimany R
    Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 14649464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer ADVIA® 120 for cerebrospinal fluid analysis and usage of unique hemolysis reagent.
    Tanada H; Ikemoto T; Masutani R; Tanaka H; Takubo T
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2014 Feb; 36(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 23937551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated differential white cell counts: a critical appraisal.
    Bentley SA
    Baillieres Clin Haematol; 1990 Oct; 3(4):851-69. PubMed ID: 2271793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feline Differential Leukocyte Count with ProCyte Dx: Frequency and Severity of a Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Error and How to Avoid It.
    Tvedten HW; Andersson V; Lilliehöök IE
    J Vet Intern Med; 2017 Nov; 31(6):1708-1716. PubMed ID: 28862354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.