BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933579)

  • 41. The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology.
    Ruzicka K; Veitl M; Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Schwarzinger I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Mar; 125(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 11231489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Differential leukocyte counts determined in chicken blood using the Cell-Dyn 3500.
    Lilliehöök I; Wall H; Tauson R; Tvedten H
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2004; 33(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 15334347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Guidance for storing blood samples in laboratories performing complete blood count with differential.
    Cornet E; Behier C; Troussard X
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Dec; 34(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 22823600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An evaluation of the Sysmex NE-8000 hematology analyzer.
    Hallawell R; O'Malley C; Hussein S; Dauer RJ; Tanti M; Wootton AM; McGrath KM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Nov; 96(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 1951184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Automated hematology analysers and spurious counts Part 2. Leukocyte count and differential].
    Geneviève F; Godon A; Marteau-Tessier A; Zandecki M
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2012; 70(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 22484525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance Evaluation of the Mindray BC 6800 Hematology Analyzer and Flag Comparison with the XE-2100 and Manual Microscopy.
    Xiang D; Yue J; Sha C; Ren S; Li M; Wang C
    Clin Lab; 2019 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 30969092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of an automated method for leukocyte differential counts based on electronic volume analysis.
    Allen JK; Batjer JD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Jun; 109(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 3838883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sysmex SE-9000 hematology analyzer: performance evaluation on leukocyte differential counts using an NCCLS H20-A protocol. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
    Buttarello M; Bulian P; Temporin V; Rizzotti P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Dec; 108(6):674-86. PubMed ID: 9384450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An evaluation of the utility of performing body fluid counts on the coulter LH 750.
    Barnes PW; Eby CS; Shimer G
    Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 15479646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of the leukocyte differential on a new automated flow cytometry hematology analyzer.
    Kim JE; Kim BR; Woo KS; Han JY
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Oct; 34(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 22591170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The white IRIS leukocyte differential analyzer for rapid high-precision differentials based on images of cytoprobe-reacted cells.
    Kasdan HL; Pelmulder JP; Spolter L; Levitt GB; Lincir MR; Coward GN; Haiby SI; Lives J; Sun NC; Deindoerfer FH
    Clin Chem; 1994 Sep; 40(9):1850-61. PubMed ID: 8070112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The lack of clinical utility of white blood cell differential counts and blood morphology in elderly individuals with normal hematology profiles.
    Brigden ML; Page NE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Apr; 114(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 2322098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. White blood cell counts: reference methodology.
    Chabot-Richards DS; George TI
    Clin Lab Med; 2015 Mar; 35(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 25676369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can the 72-hour rule based on "Blast/Abn Lymph" flag on Sysmex XN-10 optimize the workflow in hematology laboratory?
    Paridaens H; Sabor L; Simar J; Ronez E; Cornet E; Defour JP
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2019 Aug; 77(4):422-428. PubMed ID: 31418703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Flow cytometric method for enumeration and classification of reactive immature granulocyte populations.
    Fujimoto H; Sakata T; Hamaguchi Y; Shiga S; Tohyama K; Ichiyama S; Wang FS; Houwen B
    Cytometry; 2000 Dec; 42(6):371-8. PubMed ID: 11135291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A method for optimizing and validating institution-specific flagging criteria for automated cell counters.
    Sireci A; Schlaberg R; Kratz A
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Oct; 134(10):1528-33. PubMed ID: 20923310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
    Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 4000 hematology analyzer.
    Grimaldi E; Scopacasa F
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Apr; 113(4):497-505. PubMed ID: 10761450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Workflow improvement and impact of the new Beckman Coulter LH 1500 high throughput automated hematology workcell.
    La Porta AD; Bowden AS; Barr S
    Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 15224765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Performance evaluation of the complete blood count and white blood cell differential parameters obtained using a Celltac F automated hematology analyzer.
    Kondo H; Akiyama T; Tatsumi N; Nagai Y
    Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15070212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.