134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11933580)
1. Automated image processing. Past, present, and future of blood cell morphology identification.
Tatsumi N; Pierre RV
Clin Lab Med; 2002 Mar; 22(1):299-315, viii. PubMed ID: 11933580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Canine differential leukocyte counting with the CellaVision DM96Vision, Sysmex XT-2000iV, and Advia 2120 hematology analyzers and a manual method.
Tvedten HW; Lilliehöök IE
Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 40(3):324-39. PubMed ID: 21884185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential.
Pierre RV
Clin Lab Med; 2002 Mar; 22(1):279-97. PubMed ID: 11933579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absolute neutrophil counts from automated hematology instruments are accurate and precise even at very low levels.
Amundsen EK; Urdal P; Hagve TA; Holthe MR; Henriksson CE
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 137(6):862-9. PubMed ID: 22586044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automation of the analysis of cell images.
Preston K
Anal Quant Cytol; 1980; 2(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 6103684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of total and differential white blood cell counts in synovial fluid by means of an automated hematology analyzer.
Sugiuchi H; Ando Y; Manabe M; Nakamura E; Mizuta H; Nagata S; Okabe H
J Lab Clin Med; 2005 Jul; 146(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 16025090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Cell Counting in Body Fluids: Comparison of Two Automated Hematology Analyzers with Manual Microscopy.
Genc S; Dervisoglu E; Omer D; Kucukates E; Omer B; Ademoglu E
Clin Lab; 2016 Dec; 62(12):2449-2453. PubMed ID: 28164566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient leukocyte segmentation and recognition in peripheral blood image.
Shirazi SH; Umar AI; Naz S; Razzak MI
Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 26835726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An artificial intelligent diagnostic system on differential recognition of hematopoietic cells from microscopic images.
Beksaç M; Beksaç MS; Tipi VB; Duru HA; Karakás MU; Cakar AN
Cytometry; 1997 Jun; 30(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 9222100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated evaluation of synovial and ascitic fluids with the Advia 2120 hematology analyzer.
Froom P; Diab A; Barak M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 140(6):828-30. PubMed ID: 24225750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A microcomputer network for the differential leucocyte count and the registration of red blood cell morphology.
Ketelaar R; Elion-Gerritzen WE
Clin Lab Haematol; 1987; 9(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 3581716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A parallel evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers.
Bentley SA; Johnson A; Bishop CA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Dec; 100(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 8249909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Analytical evaluation of an automated hematologic analyzer: Cell Dyn 3500].
Sanzari M; De Toni S; D'Osualdo A; Floriani F; Plebani M
Minerva Med; 1996 Mar; 87(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8668289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Sysmex NE-8000. Automated hematology analyzer in a high-volume outpatient laboratory.
Brigden ML; Page NE; Graydon C
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Dec; 100(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 8249908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification and quantification of high fluorescence-stained lymphocytes as antibody synthesizing/secreting cells using the automated routine hematology analyzer XE-2100.
Linssen J; Jennissen V; Hildmann J; Reisinger E; Schindler J; Malchau G; Nierhaus A; Wielckens K
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2007 May; 72(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 17266152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of abnormal cells in white cell differentials: comparison of the HEMATRAK automated system with manual methods.
Rock WA; Miale JB; Johnson WD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Feb; 81(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 6695859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical application of automated digital image analysis for morphology review of peripheral blood leukocyte].
Xing Y; Yan X; Pu C; Shang K; Dong N; Wang R; Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 96(8):634-9. PubMed ID: 26932858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complete system control: an object-oriented approach.
Young CJ
Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12 Suppl 1():93-100. PubMed ID: 2282771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of an automated digital imaging system, Nextslide Digital Review Network, for examination of peripheral blood smears.
Yu H; Ok CY; Hesse A; Nordell P; Connor D; Sjostedt E; Pechet L; Snyder LM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jun; 136(6):660-7. PubMed ID: 22646275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
